My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 3:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br />Maki CUP Request <br />810Q Long Lake Road <br />February 17, 1999 <br />Page 2 <br />A.�a[ysisa <br />The size of the garage after the proposed expansion would be 9�0 square feei, which is <br />significantiy Iarger �han the house. This type of "imbalance" has been discussed at previous <br />meetings of the Planning Cotninission and City Council, with the general consensus being that a <br />proportional relationship should be maintained between a house and garage. Even so, the City <br />recenily approved a similar reyuest for an oversized garage located ai 2185 Pinewood Drive--also <br />a corner lot. In that casa, however, the p�•oposed garage was 53 percent larger than the house. In <br />this case, the proposed garage at 8100 Long Lake Raad would be 70 percent larger than the <br />house. <br />Dimensional Criteria <br />All of the dimensional criteria associated with this requesip-setbacks, spacing between buildings, <br />width of proposed garage, numbers of access point--satisfy the reyuireznents as sta.ted in Chapter <br />1104 of ihe Zoning Code. The back of the proposed addition rraaintair►s the currentiy�e�sting <br />sethack. The requirement that the combined area of accessory buildings shall no� exceed twenty <br />percent of the rear yard does not appiy in this case, as there effectively is no backyard on this <br />property due ta the depth at which the home has been constructed on the lot. <br />Adverse E ects and CUP Criteria <br />The City Code, in Section 1125.01, 5ubd. 1 states that tk�e Planning Commissian shall examine <br />the possible adverse effects of a cond�tional use permit request prior to making a <br />recommendation, Tile following represent those items explicitly stated in the Code: <br />Reiationship with the Comprehensive PIan. <br />The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential <br />areas so as to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and <br />residential property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property, 8100 <br />Long Lake Road, as low-density residential. This proposal does not conflict with the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />2. The Geographical Area Involved. <br />4. The Character of the Surrounding Ar�a <br />`, <br />, <br />In this area of Mounds View, there is a good mix between larger tots and smaller lots. <br />Most of the homes in the immediate area are of the same size and age, many of which <br />having garages as large or larger than that of 8100 Long Lake Road. More than half of the <br />garages in the area are attached to the principal structure. A larger garage on �he subject <br />property would not appear aut of place. `::; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.