My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 3:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
_ _ i . I ._. _ <br />l�ounds Vr�� Planr►in� Co�nrtorsseor� <br />�tegular I�I�eiang <br />�+ebruary 3, 1999 <br />Pag� 2 <br />to Chapter 401, Planning Commission, so that the Code and bylaws are consistent with one <br />ano�her. <br />r. <br />Director Jopke relayed to the Commission the fact that all Planning Com�issior�,� `etings would <br />., r=. ) <br />soon be televised to make sure all public meetings were better co�nmun�����( ��c� more accessible <br />�. . <br />in an ef�ort ta gather feedback and to encourage public invo� #� < ent . <br />Various comments were made and questions posed as tc <br />how it could be produced in such a way to make the vie� <br />such as by having a brief discussian at the beginning of � <br />to get viewers up to speed and scrolling agendas on tha ; <br />Raised that some of the work the Comrmission does may <br />wat�hing at home. A�I members voiced concerns of lo� <br />back. It was thought that raot �elevising the agendas sesa <br />viewership. , <br />5e <br />i)�sce�s�aon of Ordanan�e No. 62�9 <br />lY <br />and �ardez� sales vv�thie� th� �-3�] <br />Planning <br />yet askin <br />not othe� <br />A11 Commissi <br />propased ord <br />:e Ericson <br />mmission <br />�°�ssociate Er� <br />�at�vithout an expi <br />period af time. <br />met and admin <br />�n would tri��� <br />that <br />ang �o <br />��_ <br />��dI;� <br />repozi, r�t�i� <br />fair to a�t��� <br />,;,..: <; <br />{�n this s�tu� <br />�1�� ot ieletr���zi �ystem,���i" <br />Giware of wh2�� �� ��tn�; s�ri; <br />aboui th� pr�uxp�t �i�eting <br />;wing. Ther� was concern <br />���rn t�d�at��:,arid boring io anyone <br />�'vie�ue��"��ci ��c�t heing able to get them <br />ons �roul� �e�p;i'�t��n and expand <br />tempor��°y p�°oduce, �awr� ;� <br />.� <br />����`ghted the text of the proposed ordinance, <br />�in types of t�mporary sales operations and <br />be addressed? <br />sales should be treated equatly, either by m�ans of this <br />rc�n i,nd���;ted ihat eonditional use pernuts could be granted as normal, <br />�i�r�t� c����. With the Linders operation, the CUP typically runs for a <br />�tea°c� of that, the CUP couid be made to not expire subject to conditions <br />�� <br />�atively reviewed each year. Any problems or complaints with an <br />council review. <br />&4 <br />�t�f�';���o��s / Iieans oiI�fo�r�aatioea <br />Community Development Directar Jopke reviewed with the Comcnission a Co�ancil directive tio <br />perform a random open-ended survey to get the residents reaction to living in Mounds �1iew. <br />The basis for this idea came from the rernr�ant parcel, asking the residents what they felt should be <br />done wiih it, as it is publicly owr�ed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.