Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />February 2, 2000 <br />Page 9 <br />pointed out that the proposed site is the second largest plot of land owned <br />Airport Commission, and they would eventually like this to be thei� second ]a <br />, f.;••.,: <br />Chairperson Peterson noted residents who have moved inta th� area east <br />experienced some troublesome situations with regard to �he vn�r�?me of traf�i�; <br />there might be some opposition from this area that would ����i�% in this L�:�sl� <br />Commissioner Johnson pointed out that these residents r�,�e <br />not oppose the airport expansion, upon signing their leases <br />correct, however, this would not prevent them from conta� <br />regard. He noted the wetland issue appears to be a very c� <br />in that it was not previously known. <br />y;;, the IV��trapolitan <br />�;�� �.i "r�3t�rt. <br />�� ���� �port have <br />nd ,���i=��,, ���^refore, <br />ve e.i ��; �.. <br />_ <br />��fl�:4� �o indicate that they';wc��Td <br />?������car� ��eterson stated this was <br />�{ �� �,'�,�a,rc;,���presentatives in this <br />��i �a•����i����, �.��a� it was surprising, <br />Commissioner Kaden commented that part of tt�� k=:a ;�3�� F�� �f�i��� �v�s that ut�ti��l one week ago, the <br />Metropolitan Airport Commission had den�e[��thei�� i,���;;��r���z;; �+r 1�11 'r,l«�y amount of wetland to <br />their own Airport Commission. He expla�,��� that th�y p1��� �t� �r� �l�i`� `incrementally, however, <br />they would be required to fill in 158 acr� of wetlan�d in order �t� ,�c��z-e �he minimum amount of <br />acreage necessary to construct the 5,000 and 3,OQ(�'foot runw�ys in each direction. He stated he <br />was uncertain regarding the s��c;c���° �rnvisions �or wetland i`eplacement, however, believed it <br />must be mitigated within the s�,�r��, ��r��tiershed,G�i,�.tict, and;tlie Metropolitan Airport Commission <br />would like to replace the w�t���,c�! ���r�ila proper�y i�c�.Y�� c�r� the Minnesota River. <br />within <br />��?� ih�re ►nu�� 1��� a`two-to-one replacement of displaced wetland. <br />�,��� �7 >would have to locate 316 acres of replacement wetland <br />t�-���:�firi�t;.of the watershed district. <br />Commissionex �a��.�a �0���8 the airpart property is located within two watershed districts, and this <br />appears t�;�e'�th� �b�;v� �x���s� r�� ��ow down the proposed expansion. <br />.;, ,:• <br />Ch��rperson Peterson a�d��i ����i; �% makes no difference if the wetland replacement proceeds 30 <br />�>..,:. <br />aG�;`�s at a time, it still mu;�t �i� mitigated according to all of the requirements. He stated this was <br />-�<<;<;; €. {,,, �. <br />��:�issue to continue to Glasely monitor. <br />reports;<w�re considered. <br />