My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2021 1:10:53 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 3:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
,i <br />Magoris Variance request <br />Mazch 15, 2000 <br />Page 3 <br />f. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other <br />property in the same zone. <br />The purpose of the variance provision in the Code is to give relief to property owners <br />seeking to improve their properties yet are unable to do so because of zoning code <br />requirements and factors beyond their control. Crranting this variance for additional <br />garage space would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other <br />property in the same zone. <br />g. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of lrght a»d air to adjacent <br />property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the <br />danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property <br />values within the neighborhood. <br />The proposed garage expansion would not impair a supply of light or increase congestion, <br />nor would it increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or diminish property <br />values. <br />According to the City Code, all of the preceding criteria shall be satisfied in order to justify the <br />granting of a variance. It appears to staffthat in this case a hardship does not e�st, and as such, if <br />the Planning Commission were to concur, a variance should not be granted to allow the applicants <br />expand their garage such that it would be eighteen feet from the property line abutting Park View <br />Drive. <br />Recommendation: <br />It is recommended that the Planning Commission direct staffto prepare a resolution approving or <br />denying the variance request containing the appropriate findings for consideration at the Apri15, <br />2000 Planning Commission meeting. <br />` ' �(.��.Qi%1 <br />�` �� � <br />Jim Ericson, Planner <br />N:�DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV�DEVCASES\VR00-001 Wlagoris Variance Report - March 15, 2000.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.