Laserfiche WebLink
__ <br />r <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />February 16, 2000 <br />Page 19 <br />Commissioner Miller agreed. She explained that at this time, they we���;' F�� <br />recommendation as to whether or not this proposal meets with �he .Code, ai�f� �s.�i <br />as far as the Code is concemed, if there was anything that wou�d �ause them �f� c�, <br />Commissioner Laube stated the Commission should serncl � <br />further work be done with regard to the Sysco considerat�c; <br />potential for variances and other problems. He indica��;d <br />they should request the City Council and the Golf Cours <br />anything can be done about the sixth sign, and if they can � <br />are a good partner with the City. He added it wou,{d <br />Commission to send this back with this recommendation. nr. <br />Commissioner Miller inquired if they could <br />particular resolution. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated this <br />Commissioner Kaden stated it <br />before the Commission, and fc <br />Sysco. <br />��� <br />to the <br />i�'opriate <br />t the Co <br />back <br />making a <br />not certain <br />s r�qtaest. .;:�,� <br />>:. ;:. <br />�-:;� <br />°. ,�,. <br />.t� :a recomrr����c1���.i�:�t� s:���� ' <br />; <br />�. . <br />,. <br />" 1t �s not t}�ex�c' <%�L�ri ���`. ,�: <br />L�`a2k ���t�re they make thcir de�°��>�*�zi, <br />� ��c����r-��i�b:�� attempt to determine if <br />�»� !� �uaci� �:��u�o, simply because they <br />�lie ��i�, ����� �i�e.hali of the Planning <br />or io �n��i�i,,�; �q��� c��c+sion. <br />��.��a�e iter��, �nc1 r�ot act upon this <br />�':i1�a�; �'lanning Commission. <br />�le the resolution that is currently <br />attempt to resolve the issues with <br />Comn�«�ri��� ��s��elopme��i: �� Dir��;�e>r Jopke st��.fied ttiis could be done, however, the Planning <br />Comi7��s ;��r��s ���r,���nmer��atit��� c;<f�.,,€�� �.nclude a stipulation to this effect. <br />Commission�r' �c���aic9c��� :,�o�r��<;�i �t�s� �;hai t�ie Planning Commission could table the item for 60 <br />days. He stac�� �:t �1��:_�r �,�3.f,rov� �lii� ���soiution, and forward it to the Council, the Council could <br />change it, �pprov� ii:, ���c� A;�a<��, iNO�ald b�'the iinal decision. He stated he would rather see the item <br />tabled, �nd a separai� rr:f,�3rr�����;�i=iation forwarded to the Council. <br />ssioner Stevenso�;;;st�,t�d he did not believe they could vote on the matter at this time, <br />: knowing if the is;sues that have come forward could be resolved. <br />ioner Joh��s;a`� stated the issues pertain to the appearance of the billboards, the spacing, <br />;<:;;<<::;.<, <br />ysco prpposal, which must be resolved before the Commission could vote on the matter. <br />K�c� �i''staff could provide some language to this effect. <br />CommuniYy ]Development Director Jopke suggested they stipulate that the billboards on the City <br />property be located in such a manner as to allow two billboards on the Sysco property. <br />Commissioner Miller pointed out that the Planning Commission could not necessarily approve the <br />installation of six billboards. <br />