My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2021 1:10:53 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 3:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commisseon <br />Regular Meeting <br />MOTION/SECOND: StevensonBerke. To Table Considerati <br />the March l, 2000 Meeting of the Planning Commission. >f <br />Ayes — 8 Nays — 0 <br />Chairperson Peterson summarized that they were left with <br />and content of the signs, as well as testimony from the audie <br />with staf�s conclusion that the property values would no� <br />issues for staff and the two applicants. He requested clat� <br />City was applying for the permit on behalf of Eller Ivledaa <br />Community Development Director Jopke advis <br />City, as the property owner, and the City is th� a� <br />David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road stated he <br />; <br />indicated he had seen the Planning �t�mmissio <br />Commission was about to table this �t�r�: He a <br />Superintendent John Hammersch��zcl� had indir�;�'r. <br />lose $800 per day, and he had wan�t;d to m�l<.� �t <br />he did r�c��: �� ���;lieve the :i��r�a '��ould be ����b <br />, <br />Hammet's�hxt�ir.lf: �was noi �r��Fx��,. � a, �» had ir�ci,ic <br />Commissior��r ��o1�z��o�� <br />days, howeve�-, 'r.��� 1�'icy <br />Mr. Jahnk�;stal�ci il�iy <br />:::.:> <br />for 6Q;;d;�ys. <br />�i �'`: <br />��°: :; <br />�TanA � <br />missioner Johnson <br />��`�i►nin� Commission. <br />�ia.i�'d �i� <br />�:oulc� �e <br />�ci., <br />ai1i. � <br />February 16, 2000 <br />Page 21 <br />Resolu�ior� i�f�. �O6•-00, Until <br />.:��� �<: <br />,�:,� : <br />The;tfi�tion r,a.rri��_ � <br />c?'<<�` ��l z1 <br />��;:•,�a�;� of placement, conv'r,it�c;�ic�n <br />xj���i�e��ai; �egarding a disagreerr►ent <br />ra�n��xr.��t�, 1�� stated these were <br />io�� Y'�����a r,�ic;s>;. u�hether or not the <br />m Use ��Y�rni'� is issued to the <br />��ttended t�� g�r�vious Council meeting. He <br />rieeting on, television, and had seen that the <br />sed that a� the Council meeting, Golf Course <br />that if th�s matter was delayed, the City would <br />�Ia���rz��� Commission aware of this. He stated <br />�r�c�ing that he was uncertain why Mr. <br />:� c1�.is was a very important issue. <br />e�-stand the importance of $800 per day for the next 14 <br />:these signs for the next 15 years. <br />, with this postponement, the item could be delayed <br />that the item had been tabled unit the March 1 meeting of the <br />��.r. ..=U�hnke stated ;;he� had simply wanted to inform the Commission regarding the apparent <br />u�-��xa�,y of th�s z��-#�fer. He explained that the bonds could not be paid on the golf course, which <br />pf�; a;�jcat u'�r� happy about, however, when it comes to his money, he does not want to see any <br />��;�<�y�, �� commented that this is not to say that he likes the signs either, however, he does not <br />lilce 'co �ay out of his own pocket for these things. He thanked the Planning Commission for their <br />consideration. <br />Commissioner Miller stated they did not want to see any delays either, however, they would like <br />to be fair to Sysco. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.