My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2021 1:10:53 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 3:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />February 16, 2000 <br />Page 23 <br />Chairperson Peterson commented that the issue of $800 per day,in lost re <br />premature to bring forward at this point, because there are so maay steps ir} <br />Mr. Dean pointed out that this was not their number, howev�r, �`t was <br />sense of urgency with regard to this matter. <br />somewhat <br />i�r-, ihe <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated the Planning Commissio��. .,�tr����,� �,;�ir�pletely ignore this %�t:�r at <br />this time. <br />Commissioner Laube stated the first item to forward to th� �`'o�bncii z� � 3�r��k��i: i:l�at the City work <br />with Sysco to resolve the sign spacing issue as relates co the �ysco �rc�s�t i�,T, ' <br />Chairperson Peterson inquired if both applicants f�1i' (:E�.�y �c��i�t� �,�orlc out sptxxe sort of agreement <br />to the benefit of both parties. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated on <br />explained that this depends upon the,s,� <br />environmental features on the golf cc�u <br />of the;;,�ity, thf <br />and t��re may b <br />th� ��liacent pro <br />d'`do vvhat they could. He <br />concerns regarding different <br />Chairperson Peterson stated he wrou�d like to �;ti�x�sa��n p,a�.c� rieed for a formal resolution in order to <br />proceed ir� �rk�at appears cQ be �1n� i�atural covA-s� �i r��;�i�3r�. <br />Planniri� �s�e��zat� ]Ericso� stai�d the City would sit down with Sysco representatives and <br />examine tl1i� ���;�a�, <br />Commissioner �i.P�r���sa� stated the s� <br />�s� �;,. ;>;, <br />Comr�t�qioner Hegland s��i�;c� a l�i�� shc <br />item was in regard to the design of the signs. <br />be related to any type of plan to expand the golf course. <br />;ff <br />rimissioner Laube expl;�ined that the golf course expansion has not been researched in terms o <br />wetlands or the oth����onsiderations. He stated all of the signs should be of consistent design. <br />;�,:; <br />� Stey;��son pointed out that he, Mr. Seipp, and Chairperson Peterson had attempte <br />� prs�s�bility of the last nine holes of the golf course, as members of the Golf Course <br />�d advised that this expansion may never occur. He stated in light of this, none of <br />nsideration should be tied in with the golf course expansion. <br />Mr. Seipp stated in his recollection, the primary concern with regard to the golf course expansion <br />was the wetlands, adding that this was Sysco's reason for dedicating almost 40 acres to the City, <br />and requested this property remain in the park system. He added that this was also the reason <br />they had considered so many different designs, in order to construct the golf course with the least <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.