Laserfiche WebLink
� - --� . �...r, -:-�-� �.�f...�_�:_.� --. . �_;� ''L� - �`_-- �: : I_._=--- --- = .-�' - E,-'-=�_ - - �_: <br />Messiah Church <br />March 15, 2000 <br />Page 4 <br />As discussed at the last Planning Commission meeting an March 15, 2000, all of the specific CLTP <br />requirements addressed in Section 1106.04 of the Zoning Code are satisfied, with the exception of <br />screening. The landscape plan indicates a natural Arborvitae screen at the northeast corner of the <br />lot. After changing to the taller arborvitae as recommended by the City rorester, the screening to <br />the east should be satisfied. The landscape plan does not, however, address screening to the south <br />along Knoliwood Drive and as such should be revised in some manner in accordance with input <br />from the Commission and area residents. <br />The Planning Commission has also reviewed the general conditional use permit requirements as <br />well as the adverse effects criteria. Again, with the exception of screening, all of the general <br />requirements appear to be met. A question was raised with regard to the potential traffic issues <br />that could be generated with regard to the expansion. As stated at the last meeting, it is not <br />expected that the first phase of the expansion would add any signiiicant volume to either <br />Knollwood Drive or County Road HZ. Looking toward full build-out, staff is concerned about <br />the potential for congestion in this area. <br />The City Code in Section 1125.01, Subd.le, requires that the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />consider possible adverse affects of the proposed use, or in this case, the existing use and <br />expansion thereo£ As addressed at the last meeting, staff feels that the impacts of this use and <br />expansion to be minimal, considering its 60-year history of operation without incident or <br />complaint. The use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which designates this area as <br />Institutional. The need for the Church is clearly demonstrated from its continued presence and <br />proposed expansion at this location. <br />Recommendation: <br />Of the issues of concern left unresolved from the meeting on March 15, 2000, only two remain; <br />the landscaping plan and the drainage and stormwater plans. While staff would recommend the <br />addition of plantings along the southern property line to further screen the use from the residential <br />property at 7215 Knollwood Drive and the changes as suggested by the City Forester, the <br />Planning Commission will need to review the landscape plan and determine its overall sufficiency. <br />Regarding the drainage issues, Rice Creek Watershed District will be acting on the applicant's <br />watershed permit, which will necessitate a delineation of the wetland, among other things. <br />Staff would feel comfortable recommending that the Planning Commission approve a resolution <br />contingent on changes to the landscape plan and subject to Rice Creek watershed permit <br />approval, yet would advise that the City Council table action until the watershed approval is <br />granted. <br />If the Commission so desires, staffwill draft a resolution for action at the next Planning <br />Commission meeting on April 19, 2000. <br />� �JV1 YI�PA <br />James Ericson, Planner <br />1:1DATA\GKOUPS\COMDTiV�DGVCAS�S\Cu00-OO1�E'C Messiah Report - April 5, 2000.doc <br />