|
. _ . ., � �y
<br />� ,
<br />f , 1� �� .�_� _ _ � ,
<br />---�_--- - -- . ---- _�- �-__ _..� ------ --- __.__ �._ - �. . _. .�..� ,�_.� _.-.
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission
<br />Regular Meeting
<br />March 1, 2000
<br />Page 6
<br />Commissioner Johnson inquired regarding the area required to construct a m
<br />monument style sign, in terms of the amount of space Sysco would lose in �hs
<br />were to construct a monument style sign. ,-�-�>.
<br />, �..
<br />Superintendent Hammerschmidt indicated the monument s����'sign v�
<br />and there would be a separation of 15 to 30 feet, dependirt� upon the
<br />that the signs would be 50 feet by 50 feet, and with the ar������x� o4's��
<br />least several hundred square feet. He pointed out that w�,�� �,������,��.�fl�i�
<br />at the golf course because of the design issues that had cc�Y�<�. :k��s.��T�
<br />pertaining to the monopole structures. He stated he wou� ��;��s ��a.F
<br />proceed, however, if his spacing calculations at the golf cat�,'s� a��� ����
<br />a need to install a sign in their parking lot, and cou.lc� a�►��all the mi
<br />locations he has suggested. He explained that t�-��.a� �, _-'_� ; ���;� ��af�"i�
<br />would nice to have similar signs. ,
<br />Commissioner Johnson inquired reg
<br />golf course, and the location of
<br />Hammerschmidt stated approximatel
<br />Mr. Co�le pointed out that this
<br />Superintez�d��afi �Iammers�lt���ti
<br />feet, th��r� ��a�is� not be �a������
<br />physic��'' ���•r�.�� ��
<br />Commissioner 1��11�r �t�uired
<br />six. Superint�a�€���tt ��r� 3�;k�.s��: �r
<br />distance l�`�reen th� ��s���x ��xk��
<br />�"%��� �`
<br />� %%
<br />Co,m�ussioner Hegland z�t,;a =� ��:�
<br />satisfy
<br />m to
<br />�t sign �' "n th�
<br />;:.,
<br />�x�
<br />600 fe�t.
<br />1 versus a
<br />lot if they
<br />�uld ��t `� I aE.cti �at 1�r��h,
<br />a[,g�t angt�;. ��� �l��ii����cl
<br />�y poles, woulr� z��rt�k��� ��
<br />the monument si'y��; ��1;frz�
<br />�1 in the initial discussion
<br />���i� io tell Sysco how to
<br />c; � � ;��r>co would not have
<br />�ui�e;�t style signs at the
<br />�A�i a o�rn for this, and it
<br />i��t�a sign proposed on the
<br />i-operty. Superintendent
<br />OT,s�cing requirement.
<br />t���pacing requirement were changed to 800
<br />more signs at the golf course because of the
<br />if tl�e �`;x�;� 't��rald consider five signs at the golf course, instead of
<br />,hrnaic�t ���i.�cl tihe Council had originally proposed six because of the
<br /># l �� r;cor►omic factors.
<br />��arding the amount of frontage Sysco has on Highway 10.
<br />�a�p�rintendent Hamm . schmidt indicated Sysco has 1,200 feet of frontage, however, the plans
<br />��.
<br />�r��i�at� 1,649 feet, b�C�'use the measurements were taken all the way to the edge of County Road
<br />.�,` �T� �xplained tk�a� the Sysco property begins on Highway 10, and extends into the right-of-way
<br />, �;;y
<br />c��� �.��.����y ]lt.�ati �;�'therefore, they have 1,400 feet, with a 200-foot easement in the center of it,
<br />y;�i;���� ��� �� a�i�roximately 1600 feet of frontage.
<br />�opnrn.issioner Stevenson inquired regarding the likelihood of obtaining the permits from MnDOT
<br />for the six signs proposed by the City, and then obtaining permits for two additional signs shortly
<br />tfiereafter.
<br />Mr. Coyle advised that as long as the City has approved a pernvt, and the spacing requirements
<br />and other Code requirements provided for under the State Statutes are met, MnDOT is obligated
<br />
|