My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2021 1:10:53 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 3:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- — : -- -- <br />NYounds View Planning Commission November 17, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 17 <br />Commissioner Stevenson indicated that in the case of a joint driveway, this would represent 36 feet. <br />Corrunissioner Laube advised that driveways could not be adjoined without approval from Ramsey <br />County. <br />Corrunissioner Stevenson stated he was referring to those situations where the driveways are joined, <br />and one continuous curb cut is permitted. He explained those persons with a thr�'or four-stall <br />garage are still limited to twenty-two feet (22'), and possibly twenty fou'r {24');�ti the future. He <br />stated that a thirty-six foot (36') curb cut would provide suffictent roorrk £c�z� �.G��ss to the garage, in <br />,: „ , . <br />the case of a continuous curb cut. :Fy� <br />Planning Associate Ericson pointed out on Page 4, the adc <br />line subdivision curb cut widths, indicates they are limited i:`� <br />if the driveways are joined, this represents thirty-two <br />consensus of the Commission, this could be changed tc� <br />feels a forty-foot (40') width is more appropriate, they c�C <br />width for each dwelling unit. `' <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated a thirty-six <br />appropriate. :�'�� <br />Commissioner Johnson agreed, adding <br />�20�)• <br />{s • <br />of Subt�;�'e, pert�i,����sf� �z�, ��;4;ir: ���t�'�lot <br />�:�;, : <br />�Pen`��et (18') pc� �'�' "'�1[i����, ���pi�, and <br />3;�'). He explain�c� �lo«� ir' ��: is the <br />,��;, ��:et (36'), or if the Commission <br />�r��r,;��.� � ��rNet�iy�foot (20') ma�mum <br />cut width would be <br />b� allowed at least twenty feet <br />F.>,��. <br />Chairperson Peterson tnqutred r��rding �1�r,; ���jndarc����dth of garage door on a twenty-two foot <br />i22�) garage � ;,� <br />,� � <br />Commun���J ������;���xnen� I-7�� ^�,s.x4�� �������� �c�vi�Ld that sixteen-foot (16') doors are standard.. <br />Chairperson �'e�E,�-�r��? ��i �1��1 IIe pr-°r�i�7�a��y ��'��ided in a townhome with two driveways with a five-foot <br />separation I�� ����lt�i���c� ����kt il�e ��ri�,'��'�ys were the width of the garage doors,_ and went straight. <br />back to th+�;s�`re�t I�f� t�o9�T����;�?.��d that this was workable, and that configuration of the driveways <br />in conjutiction with the ��r��' �������"s did not seem to be out of place. He noted, however, this would <br />�,.: < <br />not �,�a.ppropriate in the ��';�� {��' a three-car garage. <br />J' y �: <br />ssioner Stevenst�3� stated he had no problem with permitting twenty-foot (20') curb cuts, <br />r, he would np�>�t�vant to double that width to a forty-foot (40') curb cut. He inquired if they <br />���.d :th� Ia��guage to limit this to a twenty-foot (20') curb cut for a single driveway, per <br />;, ]f�� ��c���d a single-family dwelling is allowed twenty-four (24'), and they did not want to <br />� f�� ���sidents of twin homes, therefore, they should at least allow twenty (20') feet. <br />Commissioner Johnson stated he agreed with this, in that they should indicate twenty feet (20') for <br />a single driveway, and include a thirty-two (32') foot limitation for joint driveways, as well. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.