Laserfiche WebLink
� _ _ _ <br />. . : r � ;,�, r� <br />��> ���� -_ . � c.,? ,�.: •� ___ ��a_-:-�v-.� � - --�--a��__.__�� _ �_ ' __�_ . .._._.., --- - C� -- -__W. <br />� _ _ `�-� __ � <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />Chairperson Peterson explained that the applicants have atterr <br />one of the applicants was unavailable, and there has beeti <br />placement of the signs at this time. <br />Ms. Olsen inquired if the item could be tabled in light of tl��i <br />Chairperson Peterson explained that the Planning Co�����,.� <br />address this issue in their recommendation to the City Cou�c; <br />they have added language to the resolution that both applica� <br />Ms. Olsen indicated that until they are certain that an <br />to see that the item is tabled, 5he stated this; <br />recommendation, however, there was no assurat���; <br />advised that the item would come before the R�a�nin� <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated both;�pplicants,;;;'ve stoo <br />�':: <br />and have indicated the feel ve stro�''1``:>;that this ;��Il be resol <br />Y rY � 3� � ..,: <br />March 1, 2000 <br />Page 18 <br />to discusg ���r 3;,y���;�� however, <br />;Omple�� ��Y,� t 1.��.��;�i: as to the <br />�� 4s,ra:� �;onsidering lan����Y, �:o <br />`,�������� ssioner Miller advised thai <br />�����:i�t��,'.'�s��� ��ork together. <br />has b���3 �-��ac���c�, she would like <br />c� po b�7�i�;�� �1��;��� Council as a <br />�1c� occu�. �:�m�nissioner Berke <br />�s� ����ior �,o,�nal approval. <br />the Planning Commission <br />Chairperson Peterson stated furtl��r ��lay at �.�;�;; �'larining C��imission level would not necessarily <br />< <br />be beneficial, and it was best to �rnove forw�a,���� -��r�th; 9,h� ��m. He explained that both applicants <br />have indx���. c� their willa�r�n�� r; io work ��tpb����` �dwards a resolution, and he has every <br />confid�i��,� �,A����s1 v✓ould d�a ���. ��;a `ta�ed th�a°� +;�r�s a�motion on the floor to approve Resolution <br />606-0(Y;�� �ra���� ��� a>���.r��-al az�e��r�����t��� �a��d coir�ciions. He inquired if there was any further <br />discussiorr. <br />Commission �t1 ���-;�� ������_��;��eol clarifica��o�1 regarding the language proposed for Stipulation 5. <br />3j�s:, <br />;. <br />u�irrg"Associate �;� <br />�riction with Del,i <br />rim Use Pernut ap� <br />request." <br />,�i the proposed language indicates "The City shall work in <br />l�dvertising to maximize the proposed signage regarding both <br />Such agreement shall be determined prior to Council action on <br />Ayes — 8 Nays — 0 The motion carried. <br />����jr�,��� ��c�� i'�terson the Planning Commission voted in favor of this resolution, however, this <br />f��: t•:�� it��icate they are in favor of billboards, but rather that they must act in a different <br />c;apac;i�;y tYian they had during the previous consideration. <br />6. Planning Case No. ZC00-001 <br />Property Involved: Bridges Golf Course. <br />