My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2021 1:10:53 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 3:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. _ ___________ <br />�i _ ,�__ — - � . - � — - ----- <br />Brunes Variance <br />Apri15, 2000 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />e. <br />f. <br />!.: --- - --- �: -- . �_ _ <br />--- - - �. <br />No other property owners are allowed to build fences in their front yard in excess of eight <br />feet. <br />That the variance requested is the nzinimum variance which �vould alleviate the hardship. <br />Economic conditions alone shall not be considered a hardship. <br />The variance requested is the minimum necessary to screen the subject property from the <br />adjacent property and its occupants. The applicant indicated a willingness to "step down" <br />the height of the fence as it approaches the front of the property. <br />The variance would not be materzally detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other <br />property in the same zone. <br />Given the circumstances, staff does not feel the variance request would be materially <br />detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other property in the same zone. <br />g. The p�•oposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br />property or substantially increase the congestion of the public stt�eets or increase the <br />danger of ftf•e or endanger the public safety or substantrally diminish or impazr property <br />values within the neighborhood. <br />The proposed fence would not impair a supply of light or increase congestion, nor would <br />it increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or diminish property values. <br />As stated at the last meeting, it is clear that the property is not a factor in this request, in that the <br />property is not oddly configured, nor is it topographically challenged or situated in such a way as <br />to necessitate the tall fence. The strict interpretation of the Code does not deprive the applicant <br />use of the property. In this situation, it is the neighbors who are allegedly depriving the applicants <br />of their right to peaceably enjoy the use of their yard. While staff can appreciate the applicants' <br />frustration, tall fences in a front yard do not promote community spirit or neighborhood cohesion. <br />Recommendation: <br />Based upon the above assessment, public testimony and previous discussions, staff recommends <br />that the Planning Commission approve Resolution 615-00, a resolution DENYING the variance <br />request of Gregory and Elizabeth Brunes for an eight-foot tall fence in the front yard of their <br />property located at 8438 Groveland Road. <br />James Ericson, Planner <br />G:�DATA\GROUPS\COMDfiV�DEVCASES\VR00-002�Brunes RepoR - April 19, 2000.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.