Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />,_____ . _ ____ __ <br />: - <br />. . - - �F . " ' � -- ' <br />, . __ . _ _ . -_ � ...: . �' �.� ...' <br />�fl��.�Si% . J�.`/!: !i 1 �Y/iiij ��f !4 �% r%/i <br />' - �_ _ -- - ... - - ._ _ _-. <br />t <br />March 15, 2000 <br />Page 6 <br />Commissioner Stevenson inquired if the parking lot was directly adjacent to the <br />holding pond. Mr. Coyle indicated this was correct. <br />Chairperson Peterson indicated the entrance driveway and <br />proximity to the edge of the property. He stated the Comn <br />possibility of monument style billboards on the Sysco prop, <br />letter indicating there was insuiiicient room for this. Mr. f� <br />weeks prior. <br />Chairperson Peterson stated the requirement that the billli�3���,� i k <br />was somewhat vague. Planning Associate Ericson stated thu;� �°�;�tY� <br />provide some ambiguity as to what is aesthetically complem�� � r? �,r; <br />this stipulation was that something be done, which tli�; a�plic� <br />however, the Commission might wish to be more specif�.uc� tlxi� �-�� <br />.. <br />Commissioner Miller pointed out that the Corramrssi�r� p�-evd�,�?rxly <br />did not need to be identical. 'j '�� <br />Fn <br />Commissioner Stevenson inquired if <br />$_ <br />Commission, at the design stage. Pl,,;,�:;;' <br />Commissioner Berke indicated <br />steel pole.�Commissioner J�h <br />nature zn fr�rit of the s�gn�. �j <br />interim u ,� ��,z'��-���� ,..�.�� <br />before the i�,err� ��.���Q� � <br />the variance �5 z�c��rr 3 <br />City's ��3nent fo�� �:�; <br />Syscp��':'"Planrvng ���;s <br />r�� evas ie <br />�a.. ?; befo <br />advised <br />se� <br />parkin�; �c��,; �.��� � "very close <br />t;,had ���;v�€�r�;;�� ��sEUSSed the <br />:...; <br />however, ��t; ���s�� ���� �een the <br />stated,th� l�r ��r �f�� ,4;�3.a; cwo <br />.�. > <br />; =��:��thetically com�ler����re��:�a�y <br />� ����� ��va� olrafted specifically to <br />��.��: �s��ad��i����i that the intent of <br />�.t�� ��;F ��3f1{�;�ted is the case, <br />r��termin�d that the billboards <br />c��;:>�ack before the Planning <br />�ed that it would not. <br />�e of stone structure, rather than a <br />there should be something of this <br />��� ��� ; time� �he Planning Commission tabled the City's billboard <br />E��� €���,�;�a;��ion between the City and Sysco to resolve the issues, <br />r�`,���: ������az'n��; Commission, however, the burden of applying for <br />���� ��<�t �� �`o�a�o Sysco. Commissioner Stevenson inquired if the <br />� �;��1 �c� �iYrung, in that the City's application was submitted prior to <br />��;�nn stated he did not believe this was the case. <br />�i;�iimissioner Laube ��n��L�ar��c� if the variance request would come before the Planning <br />�.>>;; . <br />�mmission or the Ci.��°>Council for consideration, Chairperson Peterson explained that either <br />�r��� S ::;;.:: <br />could rant a va�ri�nce. <br />';<��;' <br /><: <br />�x-������a���r�,�� ; j./�iler inquired if Sysco would be able to meet the criteria the Planning <br />��� �>�'�� �;��.� h� ... ���.:5� consider in granting a variance. Commissioner Laube stated they would have <br />� � ����°���, �vidence of a hardship. <br />Commissioner Johnson indicated that if Sysco's trucks were parked against the second monopole, <br />this would prevent a complete wrap-around design, and all they could do is put some type of <br />brick in front of the sign. Commissioner Laube stated they could camouflage the pole by utilizing <br />an imitation brick wrap-around material. <br />