My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2021 1:10:53 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 3:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L - � ��i� �.: _ . <br />���/�i,�3�i =`� <br />�..�--_ - - -- <br />Mounds View Planning Commission March 15, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br />�,-: <br />Commissioner Berke stated it should be the City's responsibility to apply for the:;��'iance, <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that if the Planning Commission recorr���nc�s Bt��, the City <br />Council that the City obtain the variance, this recommendation wQuld come ����� ��a� Council at <br />their meeting on March 27�', and technically, a notice could nt�t be publi�k��;� �� �:��� rn�wspaper <br />prior to that point. He stated the City Council might o�r��ru7e the I'la���i����� ���Ar��e��ission's ;�;' <br />recommendation. He indicated this item could be sch�cluled for th� 'l�;r�a��:�. �`'' �2{'��,�lning '��?�� <br />,�. <br />Commission meeting, however, they could not be ceY:��K�� v��y���t the;�C,tty�Cou:{ic;i�� �;; ���c, �°�a� ; <br />decision maker, would respond to this particular conditia��. ��x <,,�,;�r� �'of the interir►a u�� ���,��i ,; '' � <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated they would not desire to �x �; �,;' ..�s #:�r��. <br />should move forward upon the basis that the applicant mu�a �r���y` �-�� �� <br />the consideration at the April 5 meeting of the Planning Coirimissiori. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated he believed tha� <��� ��:�a�; �:� � E���_�i.ion befo <br />forward to the City Council as presented, w�th" �ia� :�p,isy��'(s_�8,�.�;�s' �(�ai the <br />variance, the City Council would be agreeabl� io �:h�� ��� �g����;�z���1 st�,.�� <br />,. <br />sending out the notification and scheduling ��:e public he�t-af7r, ���' ���� �ari� <br />5`�' Plannin Commission meetin . � �-- ���'� <br />� g ;«:,:: s�;� - <br />MOTION/SECOND: Ste <br />Resolution No. 610-00, a <br />the Installa,tion of Two <br />,, <br />subje�;� tc� �,t���u.l�tions as ,� <br />5. <br />� <br />Hearing and <br />Proposed Ex <br />ant: Messiah <br />Il <br />nlaruier, therefore, they <br />E variance, and schedule <br />ae �:'oinmission goes <br />�licant apply for the <br />ould be comfortable <br />request for the April <br />T.o';A'1�pprove MC�nds View Planning Commission <br />�rrar��;���i��g Appr�val of an Interim Use Permit to Allow <br />is�a��; >���a.� c��,:Sysco Foods of Minnesota Property, <br />Nays — 0 <br />00-001 <br />The motion carried. <br />��a�7 �:oad H2 <br />���`Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Development Review <br />`` �he Messiah Lutheran Church Facility. <br />Church <br />Ericson gave the staii report as follows: <br />The applicant, Messiah Lutheran Church, located at 2848 County Road HZ, has requested City <br />approval of a conditional use pernvt and development review to allow for an expansion of their <br />facility. The subject property is zoned R-1, which allows churches as a conditional use. <br />Currently, Messiah does not have a conditional use permit. The development review is necessary <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.