|
.. ;
<br />` _ " - G1 f � �3„�_' � r :
<br />- - - � _ � , _ __
<br />_ _ � _
<br />l"r�/ �l�fri r... , •fi,�3, 4 ,. //,�.'.:..%:G/r .�'fi � ti�:
<br />. - � . � � - . . � -- - _ � . � _ :� �� - �- ... . -- � i-z
<br />_ -;__ .. _ ._.� . : ' .:.. . .. . ..� .
<br />- _ , _r: . ' ..-_'__ _ _. "_' ' I
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission March 15, 2000
<br />Regular Meeting Page 13
<br />the quality of the water, and with the outlet structures in place, there should be more con�rol on
<br />the uantit of the water as well. •�,'�,�/� �
<br />q Y ��<, ...
<br />.�.,.
<br />•����
<br />Commissioner Stevenson stated he agreed with staf�s recommendation re����c��r�a %����relocation
<br />'�k� r,: � l�r; �lorth of
<br />of the accessory building. He indicated he would like to see the �xucture-���+�c�
<br />; ...,<.
<br />the volleyball courts, in front of the pond, with attempts t�r mamtain s���x�; ��, �3�,; ,�xisting
<br />landscaping. � ;;>�
<br />Commissioner Miller inquired if the garage of the adjacexAC'`
<br />the two houses would be facing the parking lot. Chairpe� ,��
<br />face the volleyball court. Corrunissioner Miller stated sh�;
<br />necessary in this particular location. „
<br />Commissioner Stevenson stated there might be
<br />located on County Road H2, adjacent to the subj
<br />Commissioner Johnson inquired regarding
<br />Boen stated they were considering some ty
<br />Commissioner Johnson noted that
<br />constructed immediately, in orde
<br />indicated he would like to see thai
<br />S �.,'
<br />are remov�d. ,
<br />E���sori
<br />of the d���ti,�t°�ra�
<br />ast,
<br />of
<br />re�;a ��c�
<br />;4�=
<br />��cted by the det���s�ax���rt c��
<br />indicated the gara�� �� 7e���loi
<br />�1, that screening would t�e
<br />forthe house
<br />br this location. Ms.
<br />and landscaping.
<br />�itioring i es�den�s 11ave desired to have a fence
<br />hSl` `
<br />actual cot�s;�ruction site from their view. He
<br />vided ,a�K�oon as possible, after the two houses
<br />�;
<br />which s��,��; oi development would the parking area be
<br />';'8��.?,x �; parking area would be expanded during the first phase
<br />»>�
<br />irpersor� ����� ��sr� a��l�a,kak r� ��' �� h�'��tg�ed driveway in the northwest corner of the site would be
<br />xded �� t�i� c�ennc���€5����: �3s�_.�Fc�, or' a portion of that removed and reconfigured. Ms. Boen
<br />,: tf
<br />�d ��ie driveway �w�r���,� �� ,�i�;�����red, and the sidewalks would remain.
<br />� ��
<br />irperson Peterson iri�t�irec� if the applicant was aware of the general nature of the landscape
<br />�osal. Ms. Boen;�``3tiidicated they were considering the placement of berm trees along
<br />ft:<,,,
<br />.•.:;<<
<br />llwood Drive, a�'�und the dumpster location. She stated they would not attempt to
<br />�A'+_�,�ratly �and,se,�� the area of their future worship sanctuary, however, they would do their
<br />�:. +� r����:�3 �p �andscape within the 8-foot wide strip along the eastern edge of the driveway.
<br />3:_�� xe>��'vr�ey would scatter plantings throughout the remainder of the site to break up some
<br />�>.'u r:,z�i�;Y��, and there would be some ground plantings adjacent to the building.
<br />Ms. Boen stated a number of trees would be removed with the expansion, and she was not aware
<br />if the City would require they replace the exact amount removed, however, many of these trees
<br />would replaced. She advised that the site would appear quite barren for a period of tinne,
<br />however, they did not desire to leave it in that condition.
<br />
|