|
� � _ �;
<br />l � �I l '^
<br />��������
<br />�
<br />� •= J j i , : . � _ i _ _ � �_' -� � k
<br />_ c f - �,. _ :.� � � _
<br />- ` _° - - , _ - < _-� ,�; ,� - - —
<br />� _ � . . . - -- _ . _ F-_ � . '/ . ,, -.
<br />. _ . ... " " . . ' .. ___
<br />'%. :. ... � . . .. ._. - ;: ._--'-- �: ..: .- .. . �./1/ / .�I�
<br />. . -__- .__ __. _ . . . _ ._.. .-. ___ _. �.Cq�� �I. ____ .- � �.
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission
<br />Regular Meeting
<br />March 15, 2000
<br />Page 16
<br />was a public hearing, and notification has been provided to residents within 350 feet,.of the
<br />applicant's property. ��;;�,
<br />Planning Associate Ericson stated staff has received two tel
<br />expressed concerns with regard to this request, as well as a..;
<br />provided to the Commission members. ,��'<<
<br />Peter Murlowski, of Timbercraft Lumber Company, rP��;
<br />company was working with the Magoris with regard to ���
<br />variance request is granted, they would be perfornung tl��
<br />the main considerations with a variance is the ability to d��
<br />feel that Mrs. Magoris' situation presents a particular ha�
<br />facility out of her home, and has a lack of storage w�thir�
<br />space is finished oi� He added that the driveway L��c�ar�P.<
<br />drop off their children in the mornings and pic1�: i�t�a�,, �
<br />cumbersome. He explained that the Magoris fam.ri�y° ���� %, �i'
<br />coming of driving age fairly soon, anothe���ar wilI ���:
<br />ients who
<br />li�ve been
<br />�Y��ntative ���titie applir�:�z�, �;t���,r,� �i�
<br />� �;�`: <.
<br />���,� ilus ��rticular projec�., ,r�a�� �x° c���'
<br />�g�°>�n�Ff,�.;on work. He s�atE;rE r��pc� c�f
<br />��>s��?��'��� ����g�ship. He indicaied they
<br />����;kyx ��� ������ ���; operates a daycare
<br />��ie biousu �����;�;��i�e majority ofthe
<br />����ges���� �r�.t����� ���>z �lientele arrive to
<br />,� ?n the ��`��;�������, and this is very
<br />�����;��.of vehicCe:�,.�inc� with their son is
<br />problem. He stated they feel there is a hard��ip and aldeiil�; �,E; ���
<br />Mr. Murlowski indicated there ar�;
<br />received variances similar to that.
<br />granted for a sideyard setback fat'
<br />Terrace. He indicated a ��E�.�t.�Yar�; �
<br />locatec� �e '�.�n,.l �ark Vi��1: ��-c3�5r�,F
<br />Park �j��;�;f T:?�7av�;��as �r"���r.�� � tr�x:��i
<br />Commissi.
<br />removed.
<br />Cathy
<br />th�' ;;
<br />IVli-.
<br />Magoris indicated
<br />;ntly parks this vel�
<br />� side, which wc��l
<br />•{ ,
<br />ac�y�al eara�e.���t�'
<br />���
<br />v�rlu�h will compound the
<br />F� third garage stall.
<br />,,,
<br />: _ � :.; ; ,
<br />,�: Z� z�st three �ri�perties wi�hin 2he immediate area that have
<br />;��n; � c;qu������ by the applicant. He stated a variance was
<br />poich a�����6iox� at th�;property located at 7386 Park View
<br />�s receitJ�e.� z� �llt��r;�`or an addition and a deck on property
<br />which �,� �I ;s� ��;��rner lot, and the property located at 7312
<br />i�;� for a s����;y�rd garage addition.
<br />shed in the back of the property would be
<br />would not. She explained that this shed had just recently
<br />i this shed was utilized to store the pool equipment.
<br />he �v�ras a large van that she utilizes for her daycare operation, and she
<br />�e in the driveway. She stated she would like to be able to park the van
<br />be safer for the children, and this was another reason she would like an
<br />��°'�tevenson inquired regarding the size of the storage shed. Mrs. Magoris indicated
<br />> o�vas approximately 8' x 10' in size.
<br />Commissioner Miller inquired regarding the nature of the telephone calls received by staf�'
<br />Planning Associate Ericson stated he received two telephone calls, and a letter that date, however,
<br />he could not verify that they were from different individuals. He explained that the letter might
<br />
|