|
� Ja :n . �- j - � jti� -� ---�''. .' . . _ . . . . . _ .
<br />� . . _ . : .� : � .. : . _ __- . � .. .. _ . . . . . _
<br />� �fl�fli%/�l�//f%�� '�i/.�'Ii �.��//.%�f�/�G�1 � -- � � - -
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission
<br />Regular Meeting
<br />April 5, 2000
<br />Page 13
<br />or other uses not allowed in the district. He stated the resolution further stipulates that no, other
<br />sheds or accesso buildin s other than the existin ara e shall be allowed on the lo�;<;;�:fid the
<br />rY g �
<br />g g g � � �'
<br />shed shall be a permanent structure, designed and maintained to be aesthe��Gally pl��sing and
<br />..r
<br />complimentary to the existing dwelling and garage. ,�;
<br />,;,
<br />::.:,.
<br />Platuung Associate Ericson stated staff typically notifies the
<br />request is brought before the Planning Commission, how��,
<br />He explained that the newspaper failed to publish sev�;a��1
<br />�;
<br />Planning Commission is not required to hold a public ����:
<br />consideration to the neighbors. He stated a public hea� r
<br />Council level on April 24, and this would be published in
<br />sent to the residents within 350 feet, therefore, residents `
<br />the item at that time.
<br />Commissioner Miller stated she did not see a prob�����:
<br />the maximum square footage allowed, and it v��,�i�Ic� �:
<br />indicated she had gone to look at the propert.y,� �t�d did
<br />Chairperson Peterson stated there appea�
<br />placement of the garages was such ,.,�;'
<br />,� < �
<br />Kaden noted that even if there w��,�
<br />�::i4jC?:::s.
<br />neighbors would probably prefer rt?:,�ee a
<br />,_:::.,
<br />00,
<br />Squs
<br />002.
<br />to be
<br />the
<br />�","when a a�k;��.�����z�r.� s,3��:, pernut
<br />is has nc�� c�c�°���:��,�� �� ��i�i:> cime.
<br />���lic hear��g�''notic;e�, _c���k �J��a�, kr����
<br />��., th�� ��%pically do �,� s� �rA���<, n.,��;
<br />�°�-�x ��3 � item would b� se� ti�.h�
<br />; �F ��r„��;�.p��, and notices would be
<br />��f� ��;�,�r�;!:�a�. ���ortunity to address
<br />��ir�ced out ����.i;'i�� shed is less than
<br />�:� ';�.��� much o�-the backyard. She
<br />. ,..
<br />�,btdf �,'�Iuesty�fo be a problem.
<br />.. .......:�
<br />r�i`�ening ic� �;��a��. �a��Cyard for the shed, and the
<br />q.; ;/ , -...,
<br />t�e some aa�c�is�ional screening. Commissioner
<br />�,�:
<br />of screerW�.� on one side of the property, the
<br />;;:H;�
<br />r than iL�ms out in the yard.
<br />��d ,�,>��x�f��f�`a1���r. 'X'c� /'�;,;�s���:n� ". `�anning Commission Resolution No. 614-
<br />;���k�h ��r,�����, �,�prov�,.l ub �'�c�����itional Use Permit to Allow for a 256
<br />ydo�;r� �� ;�,� Y�`' Terrace Drive, Mounds View Planning Case NO. CU00-
<br />,�"o:'€I�:J — 8
<br />8. ;�s>�'lanning Ca�� 't.<r����'
<br />,.....<. _ _
<br />_ p The motion carried.
<br />�erty Involved: 843,$yf�'�veland Road.
<br />ussion Regarding a;;�ariance Request to Allow for the Installation of an Eight-foot Tall Fence
<br />�yyi
<br />� �ront Yard of , :�'Property.
<br />�C' %'� Elizabeth Brunes.
<br />�:�E;E�r�t: xr�p�c��..
<br />was present.
<br />Planning Associate Ericson gave the staff report as follows:
<br />The a plicants, Gregory and Elizabeth Brunes, who live at 8438 Groveland Road, are requesting
<br />P
<br />a variance to allow for the installation of an 8-foot tall fence in the front yard of their property.
<br />
|