|
____ ___- _
<br />_ - - ---- � _ - �_ .. ,,; �., r.,�rif�///i���:%,..+.-;i. �, ,,,x.:,,. ..... ,.,..:: ,. ,,. ,..,
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission April 5, 2000
<br />Regular Meeting Page 20
<br />Mrs. Brunes indicated she was in the process of re-landscaping her entire yard, due to the �i,amage
<br />caused by the removal of the tree, and in order to do this, it would be helpful to know,=���t she
<br />would be dealing with. ,>:::k<«:--
<br /><�:�:;�.
<br />Chairperson Peterson advised that in conjunction with ex,
<br />address the Council at their next session and attempt to
<br />which would probably be the most expedient means to a
<br />Planning Commission level would not benefit anything.
<br />Commissioner Laube inquired if staffcould schedule an i�di�
<br />next City Council meeting, if the Planning Commi
<br />Commissioner Hegland requested clarification regarding th
<br />use pernut. ,..
<br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that the City e.
<br />the language allowing the City to grant an interz�x;�
<br />added to Chapter 1126 of the Zoning Code r�ti�ica�
<br />an interim use permit within any district, fo�C xny us
<br />regardless of the approach that is taken, ��� Plannin
<br />possibly in terms of a typical condit�t��a��use pe ;,,
<br />because it would be up to the Cc3��ci��to �e��^���
<br />pointed out that this might invol3�� as little z��'' ��8���
<br />He explai��cl that the City �`�a.�x�.���"could sic=����_� y�a
<br />under
<br />before
<br />Commissi
<br />process.
<br />a.r��i
<br />o� be allc�
<br />R����� met,
<br />this.
<br />could
<br />the
<br />for conside�-a�ac��z::.��E ��,�
<br />the variance r�eque��.
<br />;;�,��iplying for an interim
<br />��ti ���r�� ���s�;���ri, �ss-cla,�� x���;.� ����, which creates
<br />�,�e'' �=;,�y�x,�. ��� s�at�r� _��.��;"l�ngi,�age that was
<br />�� ��s ° �,���" �_�_d'��r ����unc�� �1ias the ability to grant
<br />e ii �����n� ���,>�'°��������� �y ordinance. He stated
<br />,�"`�omrri���z���;' ���,caicl review and examine this,
<br />x&i�t, howev��,`�his vvas uncertain at this point,
<br />ir�e what�$t�'iose requirements would be. He
<br />nittm� �€��ite plan for administrative approval.
<br />��� ���.t$at a six-foot fence in the front yard,
<br />���. :��' those provisions were drafted into the
<br />j�1��;ant would not be required to come back
<br />ing Commission could assist the applicant with this
<br />� g"Associate �:�aE,���r� 2����,� �<:staff would have to examine this with the City Attorney, and
<br />fl, .
<br />�C��'tunately, the appli��t';�f�<+_1��� be left out of that process. He stated the City would have to
<br />�_� the language in a t�anri�, ���at it would be legally appropriate and in keeping with Chapter
<br />'�<. He indicated�t within the next two weeks, staff could discuss this with the City
<br />��, � rney, to see wha�::�vould be appropriate, and brin some sam le lan
<br />,� �• g p guage to the City Council.
<br />���nlalra��1 t}�a� ;;�he Council would be the body, which, by ordinance, would create that
<br />�'���� �x�E� t:k�;� process would have to commence from that point. He pointed out that even
<br />���z ��'�+`��gs��'ra�� pernut, this would not provide an immediate solution, because two readings
<br />?��'� Y� �'� �c�uired at the Council level, and the item would have to be published in the newspaper.
<br />Chairperson Peterson stated the issue of enforcement could be addressed at the next Council
<br />Meeting. He explained that this is a separate issue from that of the fence, however, proceeding
<br />with both of these matters simuitaneously might be the most efficient means to resolve this.
<br />
|