My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2021 1:10:53 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 3:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
: - _ ___ ___ � _ ( <br />_ - - : : . _: t_ - ----- r.� :- _ _ . . `__ __ _ -_ <br />Mounds View Planning Commission December 1, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />Commissioner Johnson advised that some of the ponds require to be pumped out during periods <br />of heavy rain, however, this would be the only expense he could foresee. Chair Peterson <br />explained that this was true of some of the smaller ponds with no exits. <br />Chair Peterson inquired regarding the most appropriate wording for Finding No. 11. <br />Community Development Director Jopke suggested that rather than more specific, the language <br />be more general, indicating that the Planning Commission desires to insure that this land swap <br />does not result in additional costs to the City. <br />Chair Peterson stated this re-wording appears to be appropriate. Commissioner Miller agreed. <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated clarification of this language is for the benefit of the public, who <br />would be concerned regarding additional expenses. He indicated this more general language <br />appears to reflect the intention of the Planning Commission more closely. Commissioner Kaden <br />agreed. <br />Commissioner Kaden inquired if the City would see a financially benefit with the proposed land <br />swap, in addition to obtaining the wetland, or if this was to be determined by the Council, at a <br />later date. <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated ultimately, this would be the City Council's <br />decision, however, as proposed, it is a straight land swap. He explained that the City would be <br />giving up 1.5 acres, and gaining 7.4 acres in return. <br />Commissioner Kaden inquired regarding the assessed value of both properties involved in the <br />proposed land swap. Community Development Director Jopke stated he was uncertain. <br />Commissioner Hegland stated the Commission could not be certain at this point, whether or not <br />the City will incur any significant additional expenses due to the land swap, therefore, he would <br />request language to address this. He explained that his concern is that as the matter proceeds, and <br />the Council rules on it, they consider this factor. <br />Commissioner Stevenson inquired if Commissioner Hegland agreed with the suggested re- <br />wording. Commissioner Hegland stated the suggested language does not appear to raise any <br />concern at all, and he was not certain he felt comfortable with this. <br />Chair Peterson advised that this is a preliminary stage in the proposal, and the Commission is <br />considering the "big picture" issues at this point. He indicated that many small issues will come <br />forward, however, at this point, the Commission should identify all of the large issues and <br />incorporate them into the resolution, to provide some feedback to the Council in terms of the <br />direction of this proposal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.