|
__ . . -- -: ri.. � r �
<br />Mounds View Plan
<br />Planning Commission
<br />Regular Meeting
<br />Planning Associate Ericson explained that at this time, staff wa
<br />Commission. He stated the questions before the Commission ar�'
<br />appropriate for these types of uses, should such uses be co�z�zd�
<br />right, and if conditional, what conditions would be app�t�pr
<br />conditions set forth in the examples that would certainly i�� ,�;cleq
<br />adopting another city's code, some fine-tuning and tweal�i�a�, �„ ,�e
<br />of the City.
<br />Commissioner Kaden pointed out that the language of;<;�
<br />scarification. He explained that this process involves pla�t�g
<br />skin, over which a scar heals in different shapes and des��;?n�.
<br />staff could research this issue to deternune if th�r� �rc =�r.��=�
<br />discuss this with a person who perForms the proc;������4s�_
<br />Council Liaison Stigney stated all licensin� �a
<br />, .-
<br />establishments, and there is no mentioy{��:��f
<br />..��j'Z.>
<br />tattoo functions. He advised that.:��o,me S
<br />personnel performing these proced�t�'�� ����Pla�
<br />to a massage studio or a beauty p�lor, in w
<br />be licens�d. He indicatec� g.k��� ����ld be ac
<br />require;r���iu� for other use6�:��r�r�,+�a i1�e Code i:
<br />silic
<br />April 19, 2000
<br />Page 13
<br />.:;ss<..
<br />_
<br />�;,�'
<br />/y ,
<br />i ;
<br />requ�sii���'������k from the
<br />hich z����r.y� �li��r��t� would be
<br />d condi�i��,�f?� �;� �sr a.«itt�d by
<br />te. H� ���c1rr��.�.,,r, �� � t����F;� ��ere
<br />� .:.
<br />ite,,. ,Y�it�vvever, i,� ��r� ��}�����.�;,u a�
<br />a�'�;;��to suit the s���t:+.�ic. ��c��>t�s�
<br />r�� �oY
<br />�;e� �ioes not address
<br />I ��i�� �n incision in the
<br />�G��;��1;� �ricson stated
<br />;��i�c���iot�, and possibly
<br />� aX��3����' �,� �a���fn to the owners of these
<br />of th� �x�;a`,f;c����iel actually performing the
<br />ire th�%,, you must have certified trained
<br />�ciate �ricson stated this would be similar
<br />;,,<<
<br />�f;;�;i:�``individual operators are required to
<br />�� f,.
<br />t i�e ordinance, and there are licensing
<br />guage could be patterned after.
<br />Chairp��'�r�a� £='�cc��4�n stat�� ��. �=���,��';� ordin�nce is very brief, and does not appear to address
<br />locatioYi. l��a��:a-��r�s� I°,,:s�so�ia.t�; ��ic;�r�r� ����,,�) ��.he ordinance itself does not, however, they utilize a
<br />matrix consi�� �i�r�, ,r,a�' $���; ��i�°��-�Y�t `���,������� �is�E.i�icts and a list of all of the uses, which are indicated
<br />as permitted ��� ��ar�t�zt��{{�����,� �et-1�>i���;c9>Ya��s in certain districts. He indicated that where these
<br />types o,,ry�as�s weY-e ��-�-Fx�a��;�i�, ihey wc;re pernutted by right, and did not require a conditional use
<br />ssioner Miller ad°v�s�� th�t the Commission may wish to consider the hours of operation,
<br />,,,,....
<br />ing upon wher�>;�'these businesses are located. Chairperson Peterson stated this was
<br />ed in the Ri��ield code, which also addresses additional uses in the GZ General
<br />;F-ci�.l I�istr��;%'with a number of dimensional criteria. He pointed out that St. Paul's
<br />�;� c�ral��;dt�r�resses these criteria in the matrix.
<br />�"�����3��' 1�'ssociate Ericson added that this ordinance goes no further than to specify the location
<br />of' ihe use, and in which district, in terms of sizing requirements or matters of this nature. He
<br />stated the city of Minneapolis is similar, in that these uses are specifically permitted in certain
<br />districts, as opposed to conditionally permitted. He pointed out that this might be one advantage
<br />of a city this size, in that they have many zoning districts, with many divisions and different
<br />classifications, and the uses might be pernvtted in such a limited area.
<br />
|