My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2021 1:10:53 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 3:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br />.- - --- -- --� --� - '• --. :_�: _�. �` _: -- _ -- - _- -- -�- —. . �: <br />City of Mounds View <br />Planning Commission <br />Rep o rt <br />Meetzng Date: Janua�y 19, 2000 <br />Title: <br />CONSTDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST FOR A REDUCED SIDE-YARD <br />SETBACK AT 2442 LAPORT DRIVE. <br />Introduction: <br />Spencer Mistelske, property owner of Lot 3, SMUDER ADDN.., has applied for a variance to <br />construct a home at 2442 Laport Drive closer to the side lot line than is allowed according to the <br />City Code zoning requirements. <br />The reason why a variance is required in this situation is because the SMUDER plat included a <br />thirty-foot right-of-way, named Faber Street, which is adjacent to Lot 3 to t11e west. The City <br />Code requires that all buildings be set bacic 30 feet from any public street or right of way. There <br />is no distinction made between improved or unimproved right of way, and nor should there be. <br />The Planning Commission considered this matter at the January 5, 2000 meeting. At that meeting <br />the Planning Commission continued consideration of this matter. Staff has had additional <br />discussion with the applicant concerning other options including a minor subdivision that could <br />allow the proposed house to be located such that a variance would not be necessary. As of the <br />writing of this report, staff has not heard from Mr. Mistelske about how he wants to proceed. <br />Therefore staff has not prepared a resolution for Planning Commission consideration. Staff will <br />report any additional information it receives at the January 19, 2000 meeting <br />Recommendation: <br />It is recommended that the Planning commission continue this matter until the February 2, 2000 <br />meeting. <br />N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV�DEV CASES\578-99\MISTELSK2.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.