My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2021 1:10:53 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 3:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
_ <br />--- : � _ i <br />.. - -._._. ---_ ----. .. - --� --= _- -_- - ---- <br />Resolution 601-00 <br />ASC Setback Variance <br />January 19, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br />- - -- - - � . � _ �___. _� �- --- — -� � �, �, <br />WHEREAS, a public hearing was held Wednesday, January 19, 2000, with regard to this <br />variance request; and, <br />WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal <br />Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all must be <br />satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. <br />NOW, THEREFOR�, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission <br />finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View <br />Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient hardship with regard to the property <br />located at 4749 Old Highway 8 to warrant the approval of a variance for a 37-foot front yard <br />setback for the existing office-warehouse building, and makes the following findings of fact <br />related to its decision: <br />1. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to 4749 Old Highway 8 which do not <br />apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity in that the building was <br />constructed 22 years ago and had been assumed to be in conformance with the Code. <br />2. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of <br />rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this <br />Title in that the condition has existed for 22 years and correcting the non-conformity <br />would not be feasible. <br />3. The variance request is the result of factors over which the applicant has had no control, <br />The building was constructed 22 years ago, well before the applicant sought to purchase the <br />property. <br />4. Granting a variance to allow the 37-foot front yard setback would allow the applicant to <br />utilize the building as it had been intended and obtain the property without the non- <br />conformity to cloud the title. <br />5. The Planning Commission finds that the requested 37-foot setback is the minimum <br />variance that would alleviate the applicant's hardship. <br />6. The purpose of the variance provision in the Code is to give relief to property owners <br />seeking to improve their properties yet are unable to do so because of zoning code <br />requirements,and factors beyond their control. Granting this variance for a reduced <br />setback would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other <br />property in the same zone. <br />7. A 37-foot setback would not impair a supply of light or increase congestion, nor would it <br />increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or diminish property values. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.