|
_ _
<br />� �� `
<br />� , `- -
<br />:
<br />'� -- - _-_ ._ . _.�.. ._�__ _ _ �-- - ._.. . --- -_-
<br />1Vlounds View Plannang Cornmission J�nuary 5, 2000
<br />Regular Meeting Page 3
<br />yard setback. He advised that if a variance is granted, staff recommends it be
<br />which is the typical side-yard setback for properties not affected by an uniYnpr
<br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the site plan provid
<br />approximate width of the proposed house, and this could b
<br />setback. He explained that although staf�' has not supplied
<br />this request, a resolution has been drafted which indicate�
<br />this document, if the Commission were to consider �Y�z
<br />indicated that staff has notified all property owners within :�
<br />Pam DeGross, 8133 Woodlawn Drive, stated their land �i��k
<br />that she had spoken to staffafter the subject property hac� bee
<br />been discussing the different development possibilik.�#�� �.�' �:��
<br />have determined some possible solutions for what i� ���,r,��� �`�r��
<br />Mrs. DeGross stated they own approxima��ly `2 acres oi la��
<br />houses on this property. She stated a partion of th�ir land
<br />could also utilize it as a right-of-w� y. ��e indica��c� they a� �
<br />determine their interest in develo��� i��at land 'She reque
<br />,.
<br />adding that if the City begins to gz�t varian�c53, �hcy will ret�i:
<br />, � _ ,
<br />Dan II��c�� �t��;;>, � 133 WooEdl�t7,ra,: '�?a-ive
<br />Mr. DeCBrc��.�:� �,�<���tl ��ey ��lzn s�;, i�t�
<br />stated the a��r��i�,�����' pt���o�3�� io €:
<br />however, the ��t�y ��:�� ��;����d othe
<br />requested th� Comrriz>�nzr�� ��,��s�de�
<br />where3= <�oodlawn I��-►�a� !,;�c��s '�h
<br />�. .,
<br />dev��opments together.
<br />owns N ��n °�, �'�� 3.
<br />less
<br />10 feet,
<br />=way.
<br />rs..tl�e ComrtaiE;��r�r� i�p�xr�:�i�s the
<br />;.
<br />fted slightl� �� �a���F,��u ���' �� ",��-�foot
<br />Commissi+�n wi�il �. $-�-: ��I�.������ for>.
<br />�--�oo� s�tiback, and li� c;f�s,��c�' �'��;;t��
<br />; ��a�: variance at this 'ri����;, kTe
<br />�s�� c�� e:�i�, s�_abject property.
<br />up �d ���`��3�.�' ���.Y�e�. She indicated
<br />sold, �a�c� ���� k��;�� i:la.at the City has
<br />"bi�; woa�Y. �". ' �he �rndicated they
<br />� Yhis a.re��.
<br />.
<br />nr3 are �onsidering building four
<br />�>=r;� ����ber Street; therefore, they
<br />ie�-vi�-wing several developers to
<br />i the Commission consider this,
<br />variances as well.
<br />which lots the applicant owns. Planning
<br />��f���� �heir property as well, and will also require an exit. He
<br />����6.r� {z�i'' a driveway adjacent to unimproved Laport Drive,
<br />�,���;rnpts to develop this area for at least 25 years. He
<br />hi"s, in conjunction with the existing development in the area
<br />�ugh to Arden Street, and attempt to tie all of these
<br />-,
<br />DeGross indicatec�;;tihat if the applicant is permitted to construct a driveway where an actual
<br />�,«
<br />road should be.�';:�tiey will have to request right-of-way from the applicant's driveway to
<br />�:: <>
<br />� 4he back c�f'�fl�eir property in order to build. She commented that this road should be
<br />�,K:�cl �tc� a ft�ilI� sized City street with fire hydrants and other amenities.
<br />Miller inquired why the previous requests to build in this area were denied.
<br />Mr. DeGross explained that in the past, the wetlands were in closer proximity to the property, and
<br />they have been receding, however, they could also come back. He presented the Commission
<br />with an alternate development proposal he had drafted.
<br />
|