My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-1995 EDA
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
02-13-1995 EDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2025 6:50:31 AM
Creation date
3/13/2012 12:28:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/1/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
! _ . . . ��. �� . <br />� <br />:� <br />EDA <br />Meeting No. 9 <br />� �� �' � ;' � � �' � <br />�4�,! , �,; /yJ�� <br />=I � I t I ' �.S' � � �1 � � �JI <br />I! �, 1I I �; � / <br />� ,� (J � � <br />, ., . _ �! , � '.. �', ! -, �! <br />Page 8 <br />November 14, 1994 <br />madee He briefly commented on those recommendations, <br />indicating that the issues had been resolved by the developer. <br />Keene stated that this area was identif ied as a drainage study <br />area in the Local Water Management Plan to address the kinds <br />of issues being discussed at this meeting. The purpose of the <br />Local Water Management Plan is to find out what kinds of <br />wetlands the residents want in this area. <br />Trude expressed concern about water going into the garage <br />level of the buildingo <br />Keene explained that the elevation of County Road I is such <br />that it is lower than any accessible point into the building <br />so water is not going to flow toward this buildingo Regarding <br />the groundwater issue, the sump pumps may run a fair amount of <br />time during certain periods, but Keene felt they would keep <br />the garage dry. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to Adopt Resolution No. 94-EDA17 <br />Trude asked if there was a portion of the Development <br />Agreement that would still allow for the review of other plans <br />concerning this project. <br />Orduno explained that, once the Construction Plans are <br />approved, any requirements remaining in regards to the <br />building permit would then be up to the building officials. <br />Trude asked if there should be any building contingencies put <br />on the project. <br />Linke explained that the contingencies are the building codes. <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />REPORTS <br />1. <br />20 <br />3. <br />4. <br />5� <br />Report of President Linke: No report. <br />Report of Vice President Blanchard: No report. <br />Report of Secretarv Wuori: No report. <br />ae <br />� <br />Report of Commissioner Quick: No report. <br />Report of Commissioner Trude: No report. <br />Report of Executive Director Ordunoo No reporta <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.