My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5222
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
5000 - 5499 (1996-2000)
>
Resolution 5222
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2019 10:15:11 AM
Creation date
1/30/2007 2:51:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
Resolutions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Resolution 5222 <br />April 27, 1998 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />2. The Geographical Area Involved. <br />4. The Character of the Surrounding Area <br /> <br />The majority of the lots in this area are larger than what is typical for Mounds View. The <br />subject property along with those immediately adjacent to it are % of an acre or larger, <br />some of which are heavily wooded. While the proposed shed is larger than what is might be <br />standard for this area, the placement of the building 100 feet behind home hides it street <br />view. The shed would be visible only to the two neighboring properties. The home behind <br />the subject property is screened by the rolling typography and extensive tree cover. <br /> <br />3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. <br /> <br />The conversion and relocation of the existing garage will serve to increase the su~ject <br />property's value without negatively impacting the values of the neighboring properties. <br />However, because the garage's stucco exterior matches the exterior of the home, staff <br />would stipulate that the shed maintain a consistent and uniform appearance with the house <br />until such time that the shed is removed from the property. <br /> <br />5. The demonstrated need for such a use. <br /> <br />The existing garage is small, even for a single car garage. The applicant would like to park <br />more than one vehicle inside at a time. The structure, however, is in solid repair, and could <br />be retained as a storage shed, which the applicant currently does not have. The applicant <br />currently stores yard and garden equipment outside, under their deck and in the back yard in <br />the open. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council makes the following findings regarding the <br />criteria for approval ofa conditional use permit, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 3.b.: <br /> <br />(1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and <br />other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br />(7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br />(8) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been or will <br />be provided. <br /> <br />The conversion of the garage to a storage shed will not create a greater impact on existing <br />public facilities or services, on utilities or access roads, nor will it create an increase in <br />traffic on adjacent streets. The increase in runoff from the larger structure is not significant <br />and will not affect the drainage system. <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from <br />adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be <br />depreciated in value and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. <br />The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect <br />upon adjacent residential properties. <br /> <br />(3) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.