Laserfiche WebLink
I _. <br />w - _ ._. . . . r -- . . <br />a <br />RESIDEN7IAL DEMOGRAPHICS <br />Respondents were asked a series of demographic questions in <br />order to first, establish a community profile, and second, to <br />identify large subgroups within the city which might exhibit <br />different behavior from their peers. The composite also permits <br />comparison of the sample with the actual census statistics.on the <br />community and validation of the sample. This se tion will discuss <br />the community at large, with attention to both the past growth <br />patterns of Mounds View as well as speculations about its future. <br />By comparing the current composition of the city's citizenry with <br />I <br />potential future trends, extrapolations about policy demands can <br />be systematically deduced. <br />Residential Lonqev_itY: <br />I <br />Residents were first asked: <br />Approxn nately Ihow lorag Ihave you lived <br />a n McooYradl s'V i ew 2 <br />About one-third of ti e sample reported moving to Maunds View <br />i <br />during the past two years: <br />LESS THAN TWO YEARSae .....................14% <br />5 YEARS ..............................021% <br />b -_10 YEARS ..............................15% <br />11 20 YEARS. .29'/. <br />21 - 30 YEARS .............................12% <br />OVER THIRTY YEARS.....e .................... <br />9% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....e..e...e........oe.oa0% <br />A little over one-fifth had resided in the city for over twenty <br />years. Median longevity was about 10.5 years. Although not <br />experiencing the population changeaver of many other areass <br />Mounds View has certainly not stagnated as have many inner ring <br />suburbso <br />b