Laserfiche WebLink
z . - k ` I .` <br />CITY SERVICES <br />Mounds View residents were asked to evaluate the basic city <br />services provided to them. They were also queried about possible <br />I expansions of several services, to meet real or imagined needs. <br />1 <br />In general residents were content with the services they were <br />fcurrently receiving and tended to incline against any major <br />changes from current operations or direction. <br />I <br />General City Services Eyaluationse <br />Residents were asked their evaluations of the provision o <br />eight services. They were instructed: <br />I would like to read you a list of a <br />fe services pro vided y the City or <br />County_ For each ones please tell me <br />r+hether you would rate the quality of <br />he service as excellerwi, good, only <br />j fair, or poor _ <br />Four services were rated very highly -- park maintenance, snow <br />plowing, police protection, and fire protection. The remainder <br />received less enthusiastic, although still positive, ratings. <br />Par c Maintenance <br />f Eighty-four percent of the residents approved of the park <br />maintenance services in Mounds View: <br />EXCELLENT.......e.... <br />e....... <br />a........... <br />e18'/. <br />GOOD....................a..o.............. <br />bb% <br />V DNLY FAIR....-. <br />e..e ....................... <br />13Y <br />PDOR.......o.. <br />03% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.ae .....................° <br />O'/° <br />The excellent-to-good ratio is in line with other suburban <br />1 <br />communities. <br />36