Laserfiche WebLink
I ==----- -=r--_- - 1. .____-_-` _ :._,.. k>_ " t z=:.-, '-_-- .. _ ,,:;,:.- .:I : _y_ _f, <br />f city streets as a problem at allo These people tended to be over <br />I <br />65 year olds, retirees, and over 50,000 yearly income <br />i <br />households. <br />The small number of interviewees who felt the problem was <br />i <br />serious were then asked: <br />URty do you feel that way? <br />1 <br />potholes was the majar response, with very few specific sites <br />frequently mentionede <br />POTHOLES...e....e .......................... <br />4'/. <br />SILVER LAKE ROAD.ae ...................... <br />o.l% <br />DTHERoo,e.o...asa0000,.e ................... <br />1'/. <br />It should be kept in mind that even though a majority consider <br />I <br />the condition af roads a minor problem, a majority also would not <br />support cuts in the street and road maintenance budgeto <br />l CitY Codes° <br />Interviewees were asked: <br />I Du you feel that the City is too tough, <br />about right, or not tough enough in <br />enforting the City Code regarding res- <br />iden ial property +aintenance for r+ee <br />controls outdoor storages junk carss <br />ani al cantrol, and noise? <br />ISixty percent of the sample felt that enforcement was about <br />right: <br />TOO TOUGH ...............................•••2% <br />ABOUT RIGHT.e ............................. <br />60% <br />NOT TOUGH ENOUGHe .........................32'/. <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.e...o....ae....o•..•.. <br />6% <br />1 <br />Supporters of current code enforcement procedures tended to be: <br />18-24 and over 65 year olds <br />Under 20,000 yearly ir came households <br />Critics who did not feel enforcement was tough enough: <br />Planning to stay b-10 years <br />Over b0,000 yearly in ome households <br />44