Laserfiche WebLink
L _ : . _ ' b: i .---'-" - _- :- -- -.=...:::, ,- ._ ; , _ - -- -- -------- <br />I , <br />p <br />i <br />2-5 and 21-30 year residents <br />Renters <br />Households containing no children <br />18-24 and over 65 year olds <br />1:- ` ' ". <br />Given these perceptions, the need for a new storm sewer system <br />will also be very minor. <br />To gauge support for a storm water sewer system, respondents <br />were asked: <br />Currently, the City uses a systew of <br />ponds o control the runroff fros storms. <br />Would yau favor or oppose the construc- <br />tion of stor aater rs in the city? <br />And do you feel strongly that r+ay2 <br />Given the lack of problem perception, there is surprising suppori <br />for the system, although not a pluralitya <br />STRONGLY FAVCIR .......................e...11% <br />FAVOR..a...... <br />e ........................... <br />24% <br />OPPOSE............a ....................... <br />z7% <br />STRONGLY OPPQSE ...............e.......•...19% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ........................19% <br />Groups registered high levels of support included: <br />10,000-20,000 & 50,000-b0,000 yearly income <br />households <br />t Planning to stay less than two years <br />18-24 year olds <br />pponents were: <br />45-54 year olds <br />30,000-40,000 yearly income households <br />Over 30 year residents <br />I Precinct 1 residents <br />Not only is there a plurality against the proposal, but those <br />holding intense opinions -- the likely voters -- were opposed by <br />nearly two-to-one. A referendum proposal would not be passaale <br />at this point in time. <br />However to assess reactions to a referendum, residents were