Laserfiche WebLink
Supporters were moreahighly concentrated amange <br />Less than two year residents <br />Planning to stay less than two years <br />Renters <br />18-34 year olds <br />Professional/Technical ho seholds <br />20,000-30,000 yearly income households <br />Precinct 3 residents <br />Adamant opposition occurred among: <br />i1-20 year residents <br />45-54 year olds <br />The undecided element of the community: <br />Over twenty year residents <br />55-64 year olds <br />Retirees <br />The passage of this bond referendum would require a very <br />aggressive campaign. Voter identification, and get-out-the-vote <br />activities wauld be required. To further insure paasage, some <br />provisions for elderly residents would need to be included in the <br />package. Although not impossible to pass, a successful contest <br />would result only from a well-organized campaign effort. <br />Princieal Source of Recreational Information: <br />Residents were askede <br />1#-at is your principal source of <br />infnraiaition about City recreational <br />prograss arnd opportunities? <br />The major source of information proved to be the city newsletter: <br />NONE........oe.......e...ee ................ <br />8% <br />PEOPLE .....................................7% <br />NEWSLETTER ................................48% <br />BULLETIN ...................a.............. <br />11% <br />FLYERS...................................e.8% <br />PAPERS...o ..............o..........e......18% <br />OTHER.....e ................................ <br />1% <br />The most effective communications effort would include newspaper <br />inseris together with the city newsletter. <br />78