My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4187
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
04000 - 04499 (1990-1994)
>
Resolution 4187
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2019 10:16:17 AM
Creation date
1/30/2007 3:20:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
Resolutions
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Y. ._ _ __ _ <br />The Application of Local Economic <br />Development Incentives in Georgia <br />we will probaUly not change the way we do business." Another respondent who offered <br />incentives was also cautious, "Incentives are important Uut should be "closing" aids and <br />should not "drive" project. Incentives granted must be commensurate and balanced and <br />equally available to new indushy and e sting industry expansions." Finally, closer to the <br />other end of the spectrum is the belief that, "Many people do not lilce them [incentives] but <br />almost every company of any size expects them. Economic development is a very <br />competitive business. If your community does not offer reasonable incentives there will Ue <br />several competing communities which will." <br />The site visits and telephone interviews on the topic of incentives affirmed the data <br />fi om the survey. All of the interviewees believe that economic incentives are essential for an <br />effective economic development sri ategy at the local level. In fact, most stated you could not <br />even get into the competition unless you were prepared to offer incentives. Some of the Tier <br />1 and Tier 2 comm mities said they were caught short on some occasions when a company <br />would contact them for a statement of the incentives availaUle in their comrriunities. Their <br />failure to have examptes of packages they could offer restilted in the company not contacting <br />them again. All of the econoinic development professionals believe that the incentive package <br />has to be tailored to the prospective company's needs but tempered by the 1'units af the <br />community and the potential benefits from attracting the company. Some of the inteiviewees <br />seemed somewhat confused as to the legal constraints state laws impose on their developing <br />an incentive pacicage. Some interviewees believe additional training worlcshops for <br />development professionals would assist them in more effectively designing theu• incentive <br />pacicages. State level "help lines on legal issues" would also be important. Once again, the <br />more resource limited communities, Tier 1 and Tier 2, felt this was a problem. Tier 3 <br />communities either had the resources to get the answers to legal issues when they needed <br />them or they had staff that tuiderstood the issues. <br />An example oP an incentive strategy is a Tier 1 community in which the county <br />bought a building that was empty due to another business leaving town. The incentive the <br />community put together was a three year lease-purchase agreement with the new business. <br />The building has tlu ee partitions. For the fu•st year, the company's tax incentives permitted <br />them to pay no property taxes. The second year, the company has to pay something but that <br />amount depends on how much of the three partitions they use. And then, the amount the <br />28
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.