My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4802
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
04500 - 04999 (1994-1996)
>
Resolution 4802
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2019 10:15:44 AM
Creation date
1/30/2007 4:26:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
Resolutions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />September 26, 1995 <br /> <br />Jim Jorissen, 8368 Knollwood Drive, stated he appreciates that some of the <br />council members are willing to listen to what the residents have to say. He <br />concurs with what Mr. Novak had to say. He does not feel that engineering <br />studies should determine what will happen in the city's neighborhoods. He <br />asked if it is possible to get a copy of the feasibility study if his street is <br />proposed to be redone. <br /> <br />Mayor Linke stated he can get a copy if and when his street is done. All of <br />this information would be presented at a public hearing on the project when <br />and if his street were to be completed. <br /> <br />Ms. Trude stated in order to give residents a choice, she would suggest that <br />the eight paragraph be changed to read IIWHEREAS, the majority of the <br />affected properties within the entire project may elect to reconstruct the street <br />lIat 28 feetll (rather than "widerl). . . as this would make it clearer that the people <br />do have the ability to affect the outcome and it doesn't depend upon <br />circumstances that have to be proven. <br /> <br />Ms. Hankner stated this was done in the fourth paragraph. <br /> <br />Dave Janke, 8420 Eastwood Road asked why council is trying to change the <br />standard road width when so many residents at the June meetings stated they <br />wanted to leave them at the width they are. A comment was made that the <br />decision would be left up to the residents. Suddenly, the council has the final <br />say. <br /> <br />Mayor Linke stated residents do have a say in the matter. An example of this <br />would be Pleasantview. They made the decision to go with a 38 foot wide <br />roadway. At the June meeting, a majority of the residents who attended were <br />under a misconception of their street width. He went back and checked and <br />Eastwood Drive is 30 feet wide now. <br /> <br />Mr. Janke stated he has measured in four different areas on the roadway and <br />in no place did he measure 30 feet from Long Lake Road to the third block <br />down on Eastwood. <br /> <br />Mayor Linke stated he believes a minimum of 28 feet is what should be <br />established, especially if residents want to be able park on the streets. <br /> <br />Mr. Janke stated he does not see anything wrong with a 28 foot street. He <br />hopes that the Council will table their decision on this matter and think about it <br />for a while. So many residents expressed their opinions and he feels the <br />Council is being inconsiderate of them. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.