Resolution 5352 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e . e Holiday Produce Cup Resolution 5352 July 21, 1999 Page 3 (1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utiJities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. It is not expected that this use l-vill have any impact on parks, schools, streets and other puhlic/llcilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to ser....e the area. (2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. The produce stand would be screened/i"om the neighboring yet-to-be completed Realife Cooperative senior residential complex by the Holiday building and by distance. (3) The stmcture and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent residential properties. While stqfl has no plans to show the design or construction of this structure, it is not expected that the I2-foot square stand would have an adverse appearance, nor lVOltld it be adjacent to any residential property. (4) The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. Ihe City already has given approvalfor one produce stand to he located at Moundsview Square. 711is type (~l husiness, however, depends' upon existing trafflefor the n1(~jority (~l its husiness, which means it lvill drmv primari~vfj'om those people already at the Holiday store. Having two such businesses separated by a third of a mile on opposite sides of Highway I () would sati.~f}' a need and provide for additional convenience. (5) The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. Ihe Zoning Code allowsfor this type of use with a conditional use permit. It would not be inconsistent with the intent of the Zoning Code for such a business to operate at this location. (6) The use is not in conflict \vith the Comprehensive Plan of the City. Ihe Comprehensive Plan designates this area (~l the City as Mixed l Tse Planned Unit Development, which indicates an anticipation for a variety of uses. A produce stand to be located at a gas and convenience store would not be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan (7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion.