My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4253
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
04000 - 04499 (1990-1994)
>
Resolution 4253
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2019 10:16:18 AM
Creation date
1/31/2007 1:54:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
Resolutions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 4253 <br />PAGE TWO OF THREE <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council approves the Wetland <br />Alteration Permit based on the City Consultant Engineer's finding <br />that the request does meet or exceed the applicable sections of <br />the Municipal Code; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Developer has requested a variance from <br />the 100 foot wetland setback requirement; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this request and <br />found that there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances <br />which apply to this property which do not apply generally to <br />other properties in the same zone or vicinity and results from <br />lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which <br />the owners of the property, since enactment of this Code, have <br />not had control; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, furthermore, the City Council has found that <br />the request is the minimum variance which would alleviate the <br />hardship and does not convey certain privileges upon the <br />applicant that are not enjoyed by other property owners within <br />the City; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council approves the variance request <br />within the 100 foot wetland setback requirement; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Developer has requested a Conditional Use <br />Permit for working in a flood plain; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City's Engineering Consultant has reviewed <br />the development proposal and found that there is not adverse <br />affect upon the flood plain; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council approves the Conditional Use <br />Permit for filling in a flood plain; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Developer has requested vacation of City- <br />owned right-of-way; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council approves the requested <br />vacation of right-of-way; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Developer has requested that property be <br />accepted in lieu of the Park Dedication Fee; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council does not accept land in lieu <br />of the Park Dedication fee; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.