Laserfiche WebLink
�� <br />_Z_ <br />1. Contact the "park users" to solicit their <br />inpu[. <br />� <br />2. Make sure t}�at the long range capital plans are <br />flexible. <br />3. Ciake sure that there are good communica[ion <br />channels between [he Council and Commission <br />S[aff then reco�ended that a special n�ee[ing or the next <br />regular scheduled neeting be set aside for an in depth <br />discussion of fu[ure Capi[al Improvement�. <br />The Commissioners decided that the February 23 meeting <br />would be set aside to discnss fu[ure park improvements. <br />Paxk Bond S[aff presented the data [hat had been comp3led from the <br />Referendum Survey Park Bond Referendum Survey fer the Co�miissioners review. <br />The Conunissioners accepted the stafF repor[, but ielt <br />that further discusaion of a referendum should be tabled <br />until the ci[y-wide starci sewer project is resolved. <br />Snow-Daze Events Staff ou[lined the danuary 28th Snow Daze activities and <br />encouraged the Commissioners to observe and participate <br />in the program at their neighborhood park. <br />Edgewood Jt. High Staff revie�aed the [entative proposal and concept plan <br />Proposal wi[h the Commission and solicited their input and <br />suggestions. <br />The basic proposal consisted of: <br />1978 - Development of site plan <br />Install irrigation system � <br />F.stablish turf <br />Complete finish grade <br />1979 - Cons[ruct and re-locate 4 new championship <br />tennis cour[s. <br />1980 - Cons[ruct a four lane [rack around the football <br />field. <br />1981 - Construct multi-purpose building. <br />ptotion was made by Acting Chaixman Burmei.s[er and seconded <br />by Commissionex Haake to approve [he tentative pinn for the <br />upgrading of tUe outdoor facilities at Edgewood Jr. H1gh. <br />The motion passed. 5 �.-es <br />0 u..yes <br />H.U.D. Resolu[ion Staff presented a sanryle resolutron letter from the M.R.P.A. ,.. ������i��. <br />staff for the Commieuions review. Staff ctated that the , <br />proposed d�anges in the H.U.D. Crant program would effec[ � �-.: <br />Muunds View aa they would not qunlify for funding under the - <br />proposed quallfica[ions. . .,. <br />