COMMISSION_MINUTES_1979-10-25 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

_ 6 _ �. A':..`^^t�^.$ '�5792.0�99^C =T0•=Sd th0 �ar4 gihe_ vhirjt fnrrna filCi�e � ..�., _ '� highway oryutility rights-of-way encroachment in the park. Dev- elopment plans on laad surrounding a park site should take into - accotmt the need to preserve the park site from encroachment of t' hlghway and utility xights-of-way. - More apecific examples on land use conflicts between regional parks and land uaes are: c. Industrial uses should be lonated so. as to minimize their impact on a park. Policies ahould minimize the noise and visual impacts o£ industry. Buffering the park froa industry with dense vege- tation or placing the industrial bui.ldings as far as possible fmm the park are two methods of minimizing the impact of induatry. d. Rosds and higtn�aqs should provide access to the park, but not disturb it bp rimniag through the park. Policies for local roada through parka which are not needed to provide park accese should encourage the vacation of such roads as soon as poasible. Con- ditiona for approving subdivisions which would be served by these roada ahould require new acceas roads so that the "park road" %` can be vacated. ' - e. Co�ereial uses may create visual, noise and water pollution impacta on the park. ExamQles of visual impacts are billboard and neon advertising signs, noise impact from increased traffic and water pollution impact from surface water run-off of parking lota aad other impervious aurfaces. Laad use poiiciea should minimize these impacts by requiring controls over aigna, buffering the co�ercisl area from the park cai.th vegetation, and requiriag adeqvate storm-water rim-off controls (e.g., zestricting the � � amoimt of impervious surfaces in the cov�ercial area so that water �'� '- � can nat�sally aoak into the groimd.} ��;� £. Reeidential uees ara the preferred land use adjacent to a regional �':;f park: Aowever access to the park from the residential area should '" j: be consietent with exiating accesses to the park. This miaimizea z;:s the development oE new accese points to the park whicfi would {"� E� creatn additional crowd control problems. Potential noiae and x� visual impacts of the residnetial area ahould be minimized by � �, buEEQring the park aith vegetation at Che parimeter. The davelop � ,� ment controla for new aubdivisions should prevent eoil erosion and fi� {��