COMMISSION_MINUTES_1979-11-29 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MEMO TO: Clerk Administr.tor and C'ity Council. FROM: Building and Zoning Official DATE: December 17, 1979 �/J � ��. RE: Proposed Development of Property Locatefl Approximately Within the Boundaries of Silvez I.ake aoad, Co. Rd. I, Highway 10, Long Lake Road �ind County Road H, Coordinated With the Acquisition and Development of Silver View Park On July 9, 1979, the Council passed Resolution A996, authorizing Staff to negotiate acquisition of park acreage for Silver View Park. Staff has made progress with regard to the directive of Resolution No. 996, as well as general progress with the total development of the primarily vacant parcel described above (M S E Realty/Kraus-Anderson Property). The owner/developer at this time would like to coordinate his development with that of the acquisition and development of the park, with the hopeful result being a better product for both the City and the owner/developer. The subject parcel is located in District 1 of our current Comprehensive Plan. District 1 is less than half developed and, since it is the central district core of the City, it offers itself to be a community focal point. The Land Use Map depicts the area mixed F.O.D. (conunercial, low-high density residential and public). The present zonin9 map denotes the area a combination of limited industrial, high density reai- dential, single family and two family. The overall development of this tract of land has minimally three major areas of concern. The first being the zoning and land use conflict. The second is that of good access and traffic distribution. Last of all, the impact of storm water run-off and control that comes with development. There are probably other concerns, but these at least form a basis for review. 2oning and Land Use Attached are copies of the existing zoning map as well as the Land Use la.p. The two conflict with each other for the most part. Sir.ce the Land Uae Map was adopted aftnr the 2oning Map, it would seem obvious that the I�and Use Map more clearly indicatea the direction tho City would like to see tha land developed as. The only problem with the Land Use Map is that iY is not quantitative, nor was it meant to be. Depending on the needs of the community, a P.U,D. proposal might ct�ange from time to time, adjusting itaelf to thos� needs. The owner/developer's representative is receptive to the P.U.n. cancept witA the usagea as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, it now becomes i! �-;::}�;�i,�.. ; k i: 1: