Laserfiche WebLink
�" E <br />KJUNOS VIEM PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Mee[ing <br />Page-6°----°'-'----------------°---------------------------------'--- March_I�a 1i80 �. <br />iedor �sked wAat w�s being done �bou[ existing <br />dralnage di[ches. Rose replled that any existing <br />drain�ge f�ciltties would be respected, modilied <br />or improved, but that the system would cortt(nue to <br />work under the criteria of Resolution N983. <br />Burmelster aaked if the swimmtng 4each was a high <br />prlority. Anderson sbted �t was. She further xsked <br />Krsus-Anderson If the middle T2.9 acres could not have <br />a mixture of R-1 to R-3 uses. Cremers, for Kraus- <br />Anderson, stated he tAought the tract was too sma11 for <br />a good mlx. <br />Gl�zer asked if the pond was necessary regarding Resolu- <br />tion N98j. Baxrud stated posstbiy no[ all of it. Glazer <br />then ststed he would llke to preserve [he natural setting <br />as much as possible, to protect the water as it exists. <br />Mct�rthy asked wha[ density Kraus-Anderson had planned <br />for tMe southwest corner. Cremers, for Kraus-Anderson, <br />stated single family dwellings. That [hey wanted to <br />protect ■nd preserve the rolling chara:rer. McCarthy <br />also stressed the need for mintmum aecess to existing <br />arterlals a�d the use of an interior road systeni. Cremers <br />a9reed that this wss important and was in cheir plans. <br />McCarthy asked to wAat extent were Kraus-Anderson's lake <br />development plane; were they going to seed and provide <br />bank controll tremers said that it was mandatory by <br />outside agencies. <br />Ll�airperson Mountin asked if there were any more <br />questions. There were none. <br />Haake presented the follvwing motlon, seconded by <br />Burmelster. <br />Whereas, the C(ty has tndiuted its desiro that <br />the s t�l e�own as Kraus-Anderson/Mfner property be used <br />as mixad zoning, i.e., commerelai, R-4, q-), R-2 and <br />R'1; and <br />Whereas, the City desiros to swap the park land <br />consisTf 16.9 �cres on the southwest corner to <br />Me northwest corner snd to acqufre �n addttional pur- <br />chas� of park land with L.A.V.C.O.N, funds; and <br />Whereas, the daveloqsr wlll sattsy Resalutton <br />Mo. 9 w t tha development of Osk Perk Lake; a�d <br />Mhsreas, the developer will adhere to a rfn9 road <br />concept; <br />WE MAKE THE MOTION to recommend [o the Gouncil the <br />aDProwl of tAa ir�ltminary Loncept Proposal as presented <br />6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT <br />REVIEWAL P.U.D. <br />(continued) <br />