My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-2003
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
09-19-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2022 1:39:09 PM
Creation date
1/9/2015 3:54:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV EDC
EDC Document Type
Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EDC Minutes <br /> September 19, 2003 Not Approved <br /> Page 4 <br /> 1111 B. Community Survey: In March of 1988 the City of Mounds View contracted with Decision <br /> Resources to perform a Community Survey. The survey covered nine topics: residential <br /> demographics, quality of life, taxes and spending, city services, city government and staff, <br /> development and growth, solid waste management, parks and recreation issues, and city <br /> communications. In April of 2001, Public Works presented a staff report to the City Council <br /> asking for their direction regarding the development of a Comprehensive Park Plan. One option <br /> discussed was to conduct a formal public survey to determine current and future needs and <br /> resident desires for the City's parks. The City Council agreed to create a 10 question survey in <br /> conjunction with the Parks and Recreation Commission. During 2002,the Parks and Recreation <br /> Commission developed the questions, and a proposal was sought from Decision Resources, Ltd. <br /> The proposal submitted by Decision Resources would allow for up to 50 questions,and therefore <br /> the EDC may wish to include our own set of questions related to development. Backman has a <br /> copy of the results of the 1988 community survey. In addition to the introduction, Backman has <br /> copied only Sections 1, 5, and 6. A complete questionnaire is attached in the back of the <br /> handout. There are seven questions that were in the Development section and Backman briefly <br /> mentioned each of them. Members can review the previous survey at home and discuss the <br /> questions at the October EDC meeting. Johnson asked if the survey would be done by Decision <br /> Resources, Ltd. Ulrich indicated that they were not a given, but they are the most likely <br /> candidate. Entsminger is not in favor of a survey at this time. She feels that given budget <br /> reductions, the money would be better spent elsewhere. <br /> C. Amending the TIF Plan to Identify Parcels for Potential Acquisition: In accordance the settlement <br /> with the Office of State Auditor, the TIF Plan needs to be modified to reflect properties to be <br /> acquired for redevelopment, along with residential properties considered to be substandard. <br /> Backman distributed maps showing potential lots that could be designated as parcels that could <br /> be acquired. Some progress has been made in compiling addresses, but not enough to make a <br /> formal presentation at the EDA at this time. <br /> 7. ADJOURNMENT <br /> There being no further business before the Commission,Johnson adjourned the September 19th meeting <br /> of the Economic Development Commission at 9:01 a.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Aaron A. Backman <br /> Economic Development Coordinator <br /> ffrout\CommDev\Economic Development\EDC\Minutes\Min03\9-19-03.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.