My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-19-2003
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Commission (Disbanded)
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
12-19-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2022 1:39:09 PM
Creation date
1/9/2015 3:57:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV EDC
EDC Document Type
Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> 410 EHLERS <br /> & ASSOCIATES INC <br /> To: Aaron Backman <br /> From: Shelly Eldridge <br /> UNI Subject: Building N Issues <br /> Date: November 19, 2003 <br /> Aaron: <br /> Per your request I have reviewed the correspondence of November 2, 2003 regarding the <br /> TIF Revenue Note for the Building N Project. Following are my observations: <br /> 1.) Class Rate Compression: <br /> a. There have been two rounds of significant class rate compression. In <br /> 1997, the legislature gradually reduced the class rates applied to <br /> commercial and industrial properties over a period of years. In 2001 they <br /> made a more radical reduction all at once. The 1997 class rate <br /> compression should not be an issue for this project, as the assumption for <br /> 1999 Developer Agreement should have considered the class rates that <br /> were in effect as of 1999. If fact, the class rates in effect for 1999 were <br /> lower than those in 1998 and were subsequently lowered again in 2000. In <br /> other words, class rate compression had been happening for years and <br /> were in place at the time the developer agreement was executed and <br /> should not be not a new issue. <br /> b. The other developers in Mounds View that have pay as you go <br /> arrangements have also been impacted by the class rate compression. All <br /> of the increment payments that are based on total increment generated <br /> from the project have seen reduced payments on the TIF Notes. <br /> 2.) Developer Agreement Assumptions: <br /> a. The risk is the Developers. The developer agreement defines the <br /> increment revenue to be limited to the revenues generated by the <br /> Development Property. The developer agreement does not allow for the <br /> payment of any other revenues except those received from Ramsey <br /> County associated with the specific property. The TIF Note also is <br /> 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651)-697-8504 Fax:(651)697-8555 <br /> Roseville,MN 55113-1105 Shelly@ehlers-inc.com <br /> http://www.ehlers-inc.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.