My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-2001
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Commission (Disbanded)
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
06-15-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2022 1:34:20 PM
Creation date
1/12/2015 12:13:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV EDC
EDC Document Type
Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
| ` <br /> -�a� <br /> mature nature of the communities that surround them. This erosion will not hap- <br /> pen overnight, but to the extent that convenience disappears from the strip, the <br /> changes will be hastened. <br /> As part of its mission to examine cutting-edge issues and propose creative solu- <br /> tions for improving the quality of land use and development, the Urban Land <br /> Institute sponsored a charrette on smart growth solutions leading off a series of <br /> forums seeking solutions to specific land use and growth management problems. <br /> The goal of these forums is to find ways to accommodate growth that enhance <br /> the economy, protect the environment, and preserve and improve a community's <br /> quality of life. <br /> During three days of intensive study of three strips in the Washinoton. D.C., <br /> metropolitan area, teams of planning and development experts from around the <br /> country toured and studied three very different suburban strips. The teams were <br /> made upofleading commercial developers, public planners, architects, economic <br /> consultants, transportation specialists, and advisers.pnopekxd <br /> The three strips were chosen as representative of different prototypes of subur- <br /> bon commercial environments. Rockville Pike in Montgomery County, Maryland, <br /> is a booming, mature strip plagued by legendary traffic congestion; the Route 1 <br /> corridor in Fairfax County, Virginia, represents an older deteriorating strip bypassed <br /> by the market; and Route 301 in Charles County, Maryland, represents an emerg- <br /> ing exurban strip facing first-generation development pressures. <br /> merg'ingexurbanstT|pfnoingfimt'genenetiundeve|opnlentpnessures. ULI believes <br /> that the lessons learned from these very diverse strips can be applied to strips <br /> in every city in America. <br /> ULI teams were assigned to each strip and given the following tasks: to identify <br /> the critical issues and challenges that strips face; to determine the most effec- <br /> tive ways to reinvent strips to ensure their long-term competitive position; and <br /> to set strategic principles to guide suburban planners and developers in this <br /> effort. These principles were consolidated and refined byth� thn�� t�»mssothat <br /> they could be applied universally to all types of suburban strip development. ULI <br /> had the support and participation of the three county governments in whose <br /> jurisdictions the strips were located. Each provided detailed briefing books, pre- <br /> sented background information, and led tours of their strips. A presentation out- <br /> |ining the teams'findings and recommendations was made in Washington, D.C., <br /> on June 2, 2000. to county officials, dove|opers, and other invited guests. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.