Laserfiche WebLink
The orders of the city council as to which the referendum is sought in the case at bar <br />• are clearly executive and not legislative in their nature. A direction to an officer to <br />sign a specified contract with a named person to do a defined thing for a specified <br />price is not a legislative act... It is not the laying_down of a rule, a rinciple or a law <br />by which the conduct of a public officer maybe guided. <br />Id. (emphasis added). General legislative acts lay down some permanent and uniform rule of law, <br />administrative acts relate to daily administration of municipal affairs, and quasi judicial acts are <br />the product of investigation, consideration and deliberate human judgment based upon <br />evidentiary facts of some sort. Hanson, 529 N.W.2d at 488. <br />The Mounds View City Council adopted an ordinance authorizing the conveyance of real <br />property from the City to the EDA. Although Minnesota courts have not directly held that the <br />sale of real property is an administrative, rather than a legislative act, the case law strongly <br />supports this argument. As an administrative act, the sale of property is not subject to <br />referendum. <br />Moreover, the ordinance authorizing the sale is an ordinance authorizing a contract for the <br />conveyance of property. And, courts have held that entering into a contract is an administrative <br />act. The sale of property does not establish a permanent or uniform rule of law; rather, it is an <br />administrative act that is part of the day-to-day business activities of the City. Also, the fact that <br />the Council authorized the sale by ordinance should not change the conclusion. In the Oakman <br />case, the city adopted an ordinance approving a settlement and the court, nonetheless, held that <br />the ordinance was the exercise of an administrative function. If administrative acts, such as the <br />sale of property, were subject to referendum, it would defeat not only the purpose of referendum, <br />but make it highly impractical and inefficient for the City to conduct its daily business affairs. <br />Under the case law, a court would likely find that the sale of real property is an administrative, <br />not a legislative, act. Thus, the ordinance authorizing the sale is not subject to referendum and <br />the City Council may deny the sufficiency of a petition on this basis. <br />II. State Law Allows the City to Convey Property Without Regard to City Charter <br />Provisions. <br />Two state statutes provide .support for this argument. <br />A. Minn. Stat. § 471.64. <br />The first statute, Minn. Stat. § 471.64, authorizes the City to enter into a contract for the sale of <br />real property to another political subdivision without regard to charter provisions: <br />Any county, city, town, ... or other political subdivision of the state may enter into <br />any contract with ...any other political subdivision of the state for the purchase, <br />lease, sale, ... of real property, without regard to statutor~or charter provisions .. . <br />~J <br />SJR-268835v3 <br />MU205-30 <br />A-3 <br />