My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 6745
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
06500 - 06999 (2005-2007)
>
Resolution 6745
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2019 10:11:02 AM
Creation date
4/6/2007 2:35:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
Resolutions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• APPENDIX F <br />BUT/FOR QUALIFICATIONS <br />ut- or ~ na ysis <br />Current Market Value 0 <br />New Market Value 65,600,000 <br />Difference 65,600,000 <br />Presenf Vatue of Tax Increment 15,708,780 <br />Difference 49,891,22D <br />Value Likel to Occur Without TIF is Less Than: 49,891,220 <br />The proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur <br />solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market <br />value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of taz increment financing would <br />be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after <br />subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of Tax Increment <br />Financing District No. S permitted by the TIF Plan. <br />Several issues are impediments to private development of the site including lack of access, existing wetlands <br />and inadequate roadway infrastructure. The transportation improvements that have to be constructed alone <br />• for this development (or any other type of development constructed here) total over $20 million. But for <br />Medtronic being viewed as a major asset to Minnesota's biotech initiatives and large employer within the <br />State, the additional roadway funding that was approved for this project would never have been available to <br />this site, thus not making any other type of development (housing or commercial) financially feasible. In <br />addition, site constraints require the developer to acquire adjacent land to preserve existing wetlands and <br />green space which adds additional costs. Based upon analysis of the developer's proforma the City has <br />determined that a gap needs to be filled through tax increment in order to make the proposed development <br />financially feasible. The City therefore does not believe the proposed corporate office facility is likely to <br />occur without the assistance described in this TIF Plan. <br />The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax <br />increment financing would be Zess than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed <br />development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration <br />of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan: <br />While the property could be sold to another developer for some other use, these scenarios are not feasible in <br />the market due to various constraints mentioned above along with others. First, industrial uses could not meet <br />the market valuation due to the fact that they aze single story in nature (can't get to the same density as office), <br />lack the amenities in design and construction and are traditionally valued at''/z the market value of commercial <br />and office uses. Second, commercial retail uses have the same restraint in that the market does not allow for <br />vertical commercial/retail development Although retail can on occasion have a higher per sq/ft value, the <br />lack ofthe ability to develop vertically limits the overall value developed on the site. Third, the office market <br />is still soft in the metropolitan area and the abiliTy to develop this entire site for office use is unlikely as it is <br />unlikely that the office sites developed would be of similar square footage. Fourth the site could be <br />developed for housing or mixed use, but the site would need to be built at nearly 100 percent high density <br />• APPENDIX F-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.