My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2013/03/25 (2)
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
Minutes - 2013/03/25 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:24:07 AM
Creation date
9/19/2017 12:48:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/25/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 25, 2013 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause questioned why New Brighton, Roseville and Arden Hills were not <br />currently part of the coalition. City Administrator Ericson suspected other communities dropped <br />out of the coalition for similar reasons as Mounds View. Mayor Flaherty indicated he attended a <br />Five Cities meeting recently where this matter was discussed. He commented that Roseville was <br />not interested in rejoining the Commission, but that New Brighton was reconsidering. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause inquired who would represent the City on this coalition. City <br />Administrator Ericson stated in the past, the Mayor or a Council alternate had been the <br />representative. <br /> <br />Mayor Flaherty asked if the Council was interested in making this a long term venture as he <br />anticipated the membership fees would increase in future years. <br /> <br />Council Member Gunn was in favor of the City rejoining the coalition long term given the <br />MnDOT plans for the I-35W corridor. She wanted to be assured that Mounds View had a voice <br />through this process. <br /> <br />Council Member Mueller agreed adding that the 35W corridor impacted the City of Mounds <br />View and the quality of life for its residents. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Hull/Gunn. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 8078, <br />Authorizing Membership with the North Metro I-35W Corridor Coalition. <br /> <br />Mayor Flaherty understood the role of the coalition, but questioned if the City could achieve the <br />same results by speaking with the legislature as a governing body regarding the I-35W concerns. <br /> <br />Council Member Hull indicated the coalition hires lobbyists to work on behalf of the City as the <br />Mayor and Council Members of Mounds View were not professional lobbyists. <br /> <br />Council Member Gunn saw the coalition as a group working in concert with the Council to speak <br />to the concerns of the City of Mounds View to the legislature. She was in favor of letting the <br />coalition do the majority of the work. <br /> <br />Council Member Mueller commented in her opinion, a group of people working towards a <br />common goal carried more weight versus one City working alone. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ericson requested the Council appoint a representative and alternate to the I- <br />35W Corridor Coalition. <br /> <br />Council Member Gunn explained she was willing to serve as the representative. <br /> <br />Mayor Flaherty indicated he was available to serve as the City’s alternate.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.