Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 25, 2013 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />Hearing no public input, Mayor Flaherty closed the public hearing at 7:03 p.m. 1 <br /> 2 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Gunn. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 8172 3 <br />Approving the 2014 Fee Schedule. 4 <br /> 5 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 6 <br /> 7 <br />B. 7:00 p.m. Public Hearing to Receive Public Input and Pass Upon Resolution 8 <br />8173, Adopting a Special Assessment Levy for Unpaid Private Sewer Service 9 <br />Repairs at 2508 County Road I. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Finance Director Beer recommended the Council take public comments and approve a 12 <br />Resolution that would adopt a special assessment levy for unpaid private sewer service repairs at 13 <br />2508 County Road I. He explained the repairs at this property were completed in February of 14 <br />2013. He reported City Codes states that each property owner shall be responsible for 15 <br />maintaining an unobstructed sewer line from the building located on the premises to the sewer 16 <br />main. In addition, each property owner shall be responsible for all repairs on said line from the 17 <br />building to the sewer main. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Finance Director Beer reported that a public hearing notice was sent to the property owner as 20 <br />required by statute and was published in the Sun Focus on November 7th. He stated the property 21 <br />owner has the option of paying the amount due by November 25th, to avoid interest. The 22 <br />property owner has not made a payment to the City. For this reason, staff was recommending the 23 <br />Council hold a public hearing, take comments and adopt a special assessment levy for the unpaid 24 <br />private sewer service repairs at 2508 County Road I. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Mayor Flaherty opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Kevin Staunton, speaking on behalf of Rajiv Garg, the owner of Woodlawn Apartments, noting 29 <br />his client objected to the City’s assessment on the property. He encouraged the City to rethink 30 <br />the current sewer service policy. He recognized the City had the authority to divide 31 <br />responsibility on utility lines between property owners and the City. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Mr. Staunton discussed the history of the sewer line break problems at the Woodlawn 34 <br />Apartments. He noted there had been several problems with the utility lines at this property and 35 <br />Mr. Garg had paid the past assessments. However, the event that took place on February 14th of 36 <br />2013 was different. He explained the water line to a duplex across the street broke which then 37 <br />triggered problems with Woodlawn Apartments sewer line. Repairs were made to the sewer 38 <br />service line after calls were made to the City. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Mr. Staunton indicated the damage to the sewer lines was caused by the water problems at the 41 <br />duplex and were not normal wear and tear. The damage was out of Mr. Garg’s control and for 42 <br />that reason, he should not be held responsible. He then discussed the configuration of the sewer 43 <br />line, noting the duplex across the street was tied into the lateral rise or stack. He explained that 44 <br />the bulk of the damage was caused at the rise or stack. This damage was not exclusively carrying 45