Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 25, 2013 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> <br />F. Resolution 8180, Considering Stormwater Infiltration Program (SIP) 1 <br />Appeals in Area G of the Street and Utility Improvement Program. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Public Works Director DeBar stated that Area G of the Street Program was in the final design 4 <br />phase. He discussed the Stormwater Infiltration Program (SIP) that was being followed to 5 <br />address the City’s stormwater requirements. He commented the City identified 52 candidates 6 <br />within Area G for infiltration basins. It was noted this number may decrease as the plans are 7 <br />finalized. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Public Works Director DeBar reported the City received six appeals to the proposed infiltration 10 <br />basins and two have since been eliminated from the plans. This left four appeals to be 11 <br />considered by the City. The first appeal was submitted by Abraham Eapen and Renie Abraham 12 <br />at 8305 Sunnyside Road. The owners are alleging there is high ground water on the site with 13 <br />non-permeable soils. He discussed a recent soil boring indicating the water table was 8½ feet 14 <br />below the surface, and noted the soil was sand and silt, which would not be an issue. The 15 <br />property owners were also concerned with the level of water runoff from adjacent properties. He 16 <br />commented the new roadway would be crowned to ensure that the water does not run across the 17 <br />street. Staff recommended the Council deny this appeal. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Public Works Director DeBar presented the next appeal, submitted by Sharon Goodroad, located 20 <br />at 2581 Arden Avenue. The property owner appealed based on spacing and based on the fact the 21 <br />required maintenance of the basin would not be possible given her age. Public Works Director 22 <br />DeBar explained it was not uncommon for SIP’s to be located across the street from one another 23 <br />due to the fact the roadway would be crowned. Public Works Director DeBar stated the basin 24 <br />required no more maintenance than mowing the grass. For this reason, staff recommended 25 <br />denying this appeal. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Public Works Director DeBar explained the next appeal, submitted by Randy Heltzer, located at 28 <br />8180 Eastwood Road. The property owner was appealing based on the fact a pine tree at the end 29 <br />of the block may be affected. Public Works Director DeBar reported the basin would be smaller 30 <br />in size, so as not to impact the entire boulevard and would be more aesthetically pleasing. Public 31 <br />Works Director DeBar stated the property owner objected to the spacing and questioned the 32 <br />safety of the basin near the fire hydrant. He commented there were no safety concerns with 33 <br />locating a basin near a fire hydrant and for this reason, staff recommended the appeal be denied. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Council Member Mueller stated snow removal around a fire hydrant was wise through the winter 36 <br />months. She encouraged Mr. Heltzer to reconsider his position and encouraged him to keep the 37 <br />fire hydrant on his property clear and free of snow in the winter. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Public Works Director DeBar indicated the final appeal was submitted by David and Sarah Hunt 40 <br />of 8310 Eastwood Road. The property owners thought they had high ground water due to the 41 <br />level of activity of their sump pump after small rain events. He reported a nearby soil boring 42 <br />shows the ground water was 7½ feet from the surface. Another concern was the safety of the 43 <br />water collected in the basin and how this would affect their children. He explained the catch 44 <br />basin was only six inches deep and the water collected drained away quickly. The last concern of 45