Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 28, 2016 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />the document more simple to utilize. She questioned when the updates would be posted on the <br />City’s website. City Administrator Ericson anticipated the new fee schedule would be posted on <br />the website mid-December. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />D. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 928, Approving Planning and <br />Development Fees. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ericson requested the Council introduce an Ordinance that would approve <br />planning and development fees. He reviewed the proposed changes to the major and minor <br />subdivision fees and recommended approval. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Hull. To Waive the First Reading and Introduce Ordinance 928, <br />Approving Planning and Development Fees. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />E. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 930, Establishing Residency <br />Restrictions for Level 3 Predatory Offenders. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ericson requested the Council introduce an Ordinance establishing residency <br />restrictions for Level 3 Predatory Offenders. He reported this item was discussed with the City <br />Attorney and the Police Department. He explained residency restrictions have been adopted by <br />many neighboring communities to prevent Level 3 Predatory Offenders from living near schools, <br />parks, playgrounds, daycares or churches. <br /> <br />Council Member Gunn questioned where Level 1 and Level 2 offenders could live. City <br />Administrator Ericson reported Level 1 and Level 2 offenders were not public information and <br />the proposed Ordinance did not apply to these individuals. <br /> <br />Council Member Mueller requested further information on the differences between a Level <br />1/Level 2 offender compared to a Level 3 offender. Police Chief Harder explained the various <br />levels were assigned by the State based on risk and likelihood to reoffend. He indicated Level 1 <br />offenders were to remain private and no notification could be made to the public. He stated <br />Level 2 offenders were allowed some notification and Level 3 was a mandated notification. He <br />commented the City has only had one Level 3 offender living within the City limits and that was <br />for about three hours. <br /> <br />Council Member Mueller asked if the Minnesota Sex Offender Program had a responsibility to <br />notify cities when Level 3 offenders moved into a community. City Attorney Riggs advised this <br />was a State entity that had to notify communities. He commented on the checks and compliance <br />issues that were maintained by the Police Department. He believed the City would be in a <br />decent position by approving the proposed Ordinance. <br />