Laserfiche WebLink
EDC Minutes <br />March 21, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />were interviewed, and next week the four finalists will be interviewed a second time. Backman <br />also participated in various meetings, including the Gaming Oversight Committee (2/26/03), the <br />Board of the Directors Meeting and the Membership Gaming Meeting on 2/28/03. Helgemoe <br />noted the Chamber’s Spring Golf Tournament occurs on May 20th. <br /> <br />D. Report of Staff: <br /> <br />1. Edgewood Regional Pond—Grant Request to Ramsey Co.: As part of the Mermaid <br />expansion, a regional drainage pond was constructed west of the Mermaid complex and east <br />of the Edgewood Middle School. The total cost of the project was approx. $494,000 with the <br />great majority paid for through grants. As the EDC is aware, the State of Minnesota (DTED) <br />provided $333,333 that has been fully drawn down. Other funding sources include Ramsey <br />County and Rice Creek Watershed District. Ramsey County’s policy is to contribute to <br />regional pond projects based on the relative contributing drainage area (in this case, 15.5% <br />of the final construction cost of $375,459.64 (excluding engineering and administrative <br />expenses). Backman has submitted a request for reimbursement of $58,196.24 to Terry <br />Noonan, Water Resources Project Manager (Ramsey County). He expects that to come in <br />the next couple of weeks. Following that step he will proceed with the Rice Creek request. <br /> <br />2. EDA Approval of 5 TIF Developer Payments for 2nd Half 2002: Backman indicated that on <br />March 10th the EDA approved developer payments for five projects in the City—C.G. Hill, <br />Building N, Silver Lake Pointe, Midwest I.V. and Zep Manufacturing. These payments reflect <br />the tax increments collected for the last half of 2002 and for this time period totaled <br />approximately $75,000. <br /> <br />3. Developer Activities—Community Dev. Group (Amoco): Community Development Group <br />(CDG), the developer from Michigan continues to push ahead with the retail project at the <br />corner of Silver Lake Road and Co. Highway 10. This project is moving slower than what <br />Backman would like. The problem is not the local landowners or price but rather with getting <br />the necessary approvals and documentation from BP Amoco. URS, the architects for the <br />project, have done a primarily layout of what the site could look like. It shows the 13,000 sq. <br />ft. building for the national retailer, a smaller area for additional retail, and 106 parking <br />spaces. CDG has not released the name of the end user at this point. Field asked about <br />any environmental issues on the Amoco site. Backman responded that studies have not <br />indicated anything hazardous at this point. He believes that this redevelopment will have a <br />positive effect in the neighborhood and will lead to other spin-offs in the western portion of <br />the City. For example, Steve’s Appliances is looking at possibly expanding or remodeling its <br />facilities on Co. Hwy 10. Helgemoe inquired about the intended use of the vacant lot used <br />for Christmas trees. Backman stated that Integra, a Twin Cities developer, with the intent of <br />building town homes, acquired the property. There are several hurdles with that concept, <br />including zoning changes, neighborhood concerns, and access onto Co. Hwy 10. <br /> <br />4. City of Mounds View received I-35W TCBM Insert & Chamber Resource Guide: Backman <br />handed out copies of the insert and the resource guide. Both of these marketing pieces <br />were delivered to the City on February 21st after our last EDC meeting. Copies have been <br />distributed to major employers in the community, at the Home & Garden Show, and to other <br />groups. Backman indicated that he did not have a lot of editorial input regarding the <br />Resource Guide. While he wrote up a narrative more focused on business development, the <br />section describing Mounds View ended up discussing more the history of the City. One error <br />he noticed was the total number of housing units in Mounds View. It should be 5,130, not <br />11,504. Field asked about the lower median home price for Mounds View (vs. other cities). <br />Backman mentioned the higher proportion of manufactured homes and other lower cost units