My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-2003
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Commission (Disbanded)
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
09-19-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2022 1:06:08 PM
Creation date
10/19/2017 12:07:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV EDC
EDC Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EDC Minutes <br />September 19, 2003 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br />B. Community Survey: In March of 1988 the City of Mounds View contracted with Decision <br />Resources to perform a Community Survey. The survey covered nine topics: residential <br />demographics, quality of life, taxes and spending, city services, city government and staff, <br />development and growth, solid waste management, parks and recreation issues, and city <br />communications. In April of 2001, Public Works presented a staff report to the City Council <br />asking for their direction regarding the development of a Comprehensive Park Plan. One option <br />discussed was to conduct a formal public survey to determine current and future needs and <br />resident desires for the City’s parks. The City Council agreed to create a 10 question survey in <br />conjunction with the Parks and Recreation Commission. During 2002, the Parks and Recreation <br />Commission developed the questions, and a proposal was sought from Decision Resources, Ltd. <br />The proposal submitted by Decision Resources would allow for up to 50 questions, and therefore <br />the EDC may wish to include our own set of questions related to development. Backman has a <br />copy of the results of the 1988 community survey. In addition to the introduction, Backman has <br />copied only Sections 1, 5, and 6. A complete questionnaire is attached in the back of the <br />handout. There are seven questions that were in the Development section and Backman briefly <br />mentioned each of them. Members can review the previous survey at home and discuss the <br />questions at the October EDC meeting. Johnson asked if the survey would be done by Decision <br />Resources, Ltd. Ulrich indicated that they were not a given, but they are the most likely <br />candidate. Entsminger is not in favor of a survey at this time. She feels that given budget <br />reductions, the money would be better spent elsewhere. <br /> <br />C. Amending the TIF Plan to Identify Parcels for Potential Acquisition: In accordance the settlement <br />with the Office of State Auditor, the TIF Plan needs to be modified to reflect properties to be <br />acquired for redevelopment, along with residential properties considered to be substandard. <br />Backman distributed maps showing potential lots that could be designated as parcels that could <br />be acquired. Some progress has been made in compiling addresses, but not enough to make a <br />formal presentation at the EDA at this time. <br /> <br />7. ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />There being no further business before the Commission, Johnson adjourned the September 19th meeting <br />of the Economic Development Commission at 9:01 a.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Aaron A. Backman <br />Economic Development Coordinator <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />\\Trout\CommDev\Economic Development\EDC\Minutes\Min03\9-19-03.doc
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.