Laserfiche WebLink
EDC Minutes <br />August 20, 2004 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />discussions it was clear that CRESA’s undisclosed end user was interested in potentially buying <br />the Bridges, the City’s golf course, to develop a corporate office campus. The first phase of the <br />development was a 500,000 sq. ft. facility with over 1,000 employees. Backman showed <br />members a map of the City’s property (the developed portion of the golf course—70+ acres and <br />the undeveloped area 45+ acres). To date most of the focus and information (utility and <br />environmental) that Backman has provided to CRESA has largely pertained to the developed <br />area. On July 26, 2004, the Mounds View EDA adopted a motion to proceed with Title <br />Commitment research of the property to verify ownership, easements and any covenants that <br />might exist. The City is working with Kennedy & Graven and with Old Republic regarding this <br />information. On August 10th, Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator and Backman met with CRESA <br />representatives to discuss process, developability of the site and economics. Johnson asked if <br />we are in competition with other sites. Backman indicated there are several sites being <br />considered. Field asked if there has been opposition to this potential development. Backman <br />expressed surprise that there hasn’t been more and concern for the staff directly impacted. <br />However, it is an opportunity to add significant tax base to the City. He reviewed a memo <br />prepared by Mary Ippel, Briggs & Morgan, regarding TIF considerations relative to the Bridges. <br />The consensus of the Commission was that we should pursue this development opportunity, <br />explore all funding options, and study our infrastructure requirements that would be needed in <br />Mounds View and neighboring communities for this project. [Entsminger left the meeting] <br /> <br />B. Discussion of a Proposed TIF Parcel Decertification. Backman had provided a memo prepared <br />by Jim Ericson for Charlie Hansen, Finance Director, regarding the decertification of parcels from <br />two TIF districts (11 parcels from District #2 and 1 parcel from District #1). Backman indicated <br />that the City does need to periodically evaluate whether parcels should be in TIF districts. Ones <br />that should be removed are ones where redevelopment is unlikely to occur or where <br />development has occurred without TIF assistance. The total taxable value of the 11 parcels is <br />$11,750,000 or about 10% of the taxable value in the three TIF districts. What is the financial <br />impact of this? It will reduce our economic development resources by about $210,000 or 10% a <br />year. Field asked about the seven homes being decertified. Backman replied that these homes <br />along County Road I are unlikely to be redeveloped to commercial use especially since they abut <br />other residential properties. Johnson asked why should the City approve this? Backman stated <br />that there are political and financial reasons to do so. The City Council has a number of times <br />asked that this be done (and the City has a high percentage of its commercial property in such <br />districts). Financially, when the properties come back onto the tax roles, those tax revenues will <br />go to the school district, county, and the city (the latter in the form of general funds). Moreover, it <br />is better to limit districts to parcels where we think redevelopment will likely occur. After <br />discussion a motion was made by Field to recommend approval of the decertification of the 11 <br />designated parcels from their respective TIF districts, seconded by Helgemoe. Passed 5 to 0. <br /> <br />7. ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />There being no further business before the Commission, Johnson adjourned the August 20th meeting of <br />the Economic Development Commission at 8:58 a.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Aaron A. Backman <br />Economic Development Coordinator <br />